Literature DB >> 8026048

Diagnosing and managing unstable angina. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.

E Braunwald1, R H Jones, D B Mark, J Brown, L Brown, M D Cheitlin, C A Concannon, M Cowan, C Edwards, V Fuster.   

Abstract

This Quick Reference Guide for Clinicians contains recommendations on the care of patients with unstable angina based on a combination of evidence obtained through extensive literature reviews and consensus among members of an expert panel. Principal conclusions include the following. (1) Many patients suspected of having unstable angina can be discharged home after adequate initial evaluation. (2) Further outpatient evaluation may be scheduled for up to 72 hours after initial presentation for patients with clinical symptoms of unstable angina judged at initial evaluation to be at low risk for complications. (3) Patients with acute ischemic heart disease judged to be at intermediate or high risk of complications should be hospitalized for careful monitoring of their clinical course. (4) Intravenous thrombolytic therapy should not be administered to patients without evidence of ST segment elevation and acute myocardial infarction. (5) Assessment of prognosis by noninvasive testing often aids selection of appropriate therapy. (6) Coronary angiography is appropriate for patients judged to be at high risk for cardiac complications or death based on their clinical course or results of noninvasive testing. (7) Coronary artery bypass surgery should be recommended for almost all patients with left main disease and many patients with three-vessel disease, especially those with left ventricular dysfunction. (8) The discharge care plan should include continued monitoring of symptoms; appropriate drug therapy, including aspirin; risk-factor modification; and counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8026048     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.90.1.613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  45 in total

1.  Management strategies in unstable coronary artery disease--current problems and future directions. The UCAD Council.

Authors:  F W Verheugt; R C Becker; M E Bertrand; C Bode; J H Chesebro; J G Cleland; R Conti; W S Hillis; W Klein; A Maseri; A G Turpie; L Wallentin; D D Waters
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Investigation and management of stable angina: revised guidelines 1998. Joint Working Party of the British Cardiac Society and Royal College of Physicians of London.

Authors:  D de Bono
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  New advances in the management of acute coronary syndromes: 4. Low-molecular-weight heparins.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Alexander G G Turpie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Unstable Angina.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-02

5.  Tirofiban and eptifibatide treatment of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome with non-ST segment elevation.

Authors:  Nuria Corominas; Joaquin Perez; Jose Ortiz; Elena Ferrer; Josep Ribas; Gines Sanz
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2004-02

6.  High P-selectin expression and low CD36 occupancy on circulating platelets are strong predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kagari Murasaki; Masatoshi Kawana; Satoshi Murasaki; Yukio Tsurumi; Kenjiro Tanoue; Nobuhisa Hagiwara; Hiroshi Kasanuki
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Prognostic value of I-123 15-(p-iodophenyl)-3-(R,S) methylpentadecanoic acid myocardial imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Taishiro Chikamori; Hiroshi Fujita; Mamoru Nanasato; Masahiro Toba; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Contemporary management of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  G A Large
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  The use of patient mix-adjusted control charts to compare in-hospital costs of care.

Authors:  E L Eisenstein; C F Bethea
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  1999-12

10.  Calcium channel blocker debate: true lies?

Authors:  J Leor; A Battler
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.