STUDY OBJECTIVES: The published AASM guidelines approve use of a nasal cannula/pressure transducer to detect apneas/hypopneas, but require esophageal manometry for Respiratory Effort-Related Arousals (RERAs). However, esophageal manometry may be poorly tolerated by many subjects. We have shown that the shape of the inspiratory flow signal from a nasal cannula identifies flow limitation and elevated upper-airway resistance. This study tests the hypothesis that detection of flow limitation events using the nasal cannula provides a non-invasive means to identify RERAs. DESIGN: N/A. SETTING: N/A. PATIENTS: 10 UARS/OSAS and 5 normal subjects INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: All subjects underwent full NPSG. Two scorers identified events from the nasal cannula signal as apneas, hypopneas, and flow limitation events. Two additional scorers identified events from esophageal manometry. Arousals were scored in a separate pass. Interscorer reliability and intersignal agreement were assessed both without and with regard to arousal. The total number of respiratory events identified by the two scorers of the nasal cannula was similar with an Intraclass Correlation (ICC) =0.96, and was essentially identical to the agreement for the two scorers of esophageal manometry (ICC=0.96). There was good agreement between the number of events detected by the two techniques with a slight bias towards the nasal cannula (4.5 events/hr). There was no statistically significant difference (bias 0.9/hr, 95%CI -0.3-2.0) between the number of nasal cannula flow limitation events terminated by arousal and manometry events terminated by arousal (RERAs). CONCLUSION: The nasal cannula/pressure transducer provides a non-invasive reproducible detector of all events in sleep disordered breathing; in particular, it detects the same events as esophageal manometry (RERAs).
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The published AASM guidelines approve use of a nasal cannula/pressure transducer to detect apneas/hypopneas, but require esophageal manometry for Respiratory Effort-Related Arousals (RERAs). However, esophageal manometry may be poorly tolerated by many subjects. We have shown that the shape of the inspiratory flow signal from a nasal cannula identifies flow limitation and elevated upper-airway resistance. This study tests the hypothesis that detection of flow limitation events using the nasal cannula provides a non-invasive means to identify RERAs. DESIGN: N/A. SETTING: N/A. PATIENTS: 10 UARS/OSAS and 5 normal subjects INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: All subjects underwent full NPSG. Two scorers identified events from the nasal cannula signal as apneas, hypopneas, and flow limitation events. Two additional scorers identified events from esophageal manometry. Arousals were scored in a separate pass. Interscorer reliability and intersignal agreement were assessed both without and with regard to arousal. The total number of respiratory events identified by the two scorers of the nasal cannula was similar with an Intraclass Correlation (ICC) =0.96, and was essentially identical to the agreement for the two scorers of esophageal manometry (ICC=0.96). There was good agreement between the number of events detected by the two techniques with a slight bias towards the nasal cannula (4.5 events/hr). There was no statistically significant difference (bias 0.9/hr, 95%CI -0.3-2.0) between the number of nasal cannula flow limitation events terminated by arousal and manometry events terminated by arousal (RERAs). CONCLUSION: The nasal cannula/pressure transducer provides a non-invasive reproducible detector of all events in sleep disordered breathing; in particular, it detects the same events as esophageal manometry (RERAs).
Authors: Ronald D Chervin; Deborah L Ruzicka; Timothy F Hoban; Judith L Fetterolf; Susan L Garetz; Kenneth E Guire; James E Dillon; Barbara T Felt; Elise K Hodges; Bruno J Giordani Journal: Chest Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Brian McGinley; Ann Halbower; Alan R Schwartz; Philip L Smith; Susheel P Patil; Hartmut Schneider Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Luciana O Palombini; Sergio Tufik; David M Rapoport; Indu A Ayappa; Christian Guilleminault; Luciana B M de Godoy; Laura S Castro; Lia Bittencourt Journal: Sleep Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Richard B Berry; Rohit Budhiraja; Daniel J Gottlieb; David Gozal; Conrad Iber; Vishesh K Kapur; Carole L Marcus; Reena Mehra; Sairam Parthasarathy; Stuart F Quan; Susan Redline; Kingman P Strohl; Sally L Davidson Ward; Michelle M Tangredi Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2012-10-15 Impact factor: 4.062