Literature DB >> 11004142

Differential pacing for distinguishing block from persistent conduction through an ablation line.

D Shah1, M Haïssaguerre, A Takahashi, P Jaïs, M Hocini, J Clémenty.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because complete linear conduction block is necessary to minimize the recurrence of reentrant tachycardias such as typical atrial flutter, we investigated a simple technique to recognize a persistent gap or complete linear block. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We prospectively evaluated cavotricuspid isthmus conduction in 50 patients (age 63+/-8 years, 43 men) after radiofrequency ablation. The distal and proximal bipoles of a quadripolar catheter placed close to the ablation line were successively stimulated during recording from the ablation line. We hypothesized that because the initial and terminal components of local potentials reflected activation at the ipsilateral and contralateral borders of the ablation lesion, a change to a more proximal pacing site without moving the catheter would prolong the stimulus to the initial component timing, whereas the response of the terminal component would depend on the presence of block or persistent conduction. A shortening or no change in timing of the terminal component would indicate block, whereas lengthening would indicate persistent gap conduction. The results were compared with previously described criteria for isthmus block. Ninety-two sites were assessed: 17 before and 75 after the achievement of complete isthmus block. The timing of the initial component was delayed by 19+/-9 ms, and the terminal component was advanced by 13+/-8 ms after block and delayed by 12+/-9 ms in case of persisting conduction. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for linear block were 100%, 75%, 94%, and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: An accurate assessment of isthmus block or persistent isthmus conduction is possible with this technique of differential pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11004142     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.13.1517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  37 in total

1.  Double potential interval and transisthmus conduction time for prediction of cavotricuspid isthmus block after ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  Ching-Tai Tai; Azizul Haque; Yung-Kuo Lin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Yu-An Ding; Mau-Song Chang; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Usefulness of the polarity in high-density wide range-filtered bipolar mapping to detect isthmus block during radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  Yasuo Okumura; Ichiro Watanabe; Takeshi Yamada; Kimie Ohkubo; Kazunori Kawauchi; Sonoko Ashino; Yasuhiro Takagi; Hidezou Sugimura; Kenichi Hashimoto; Atsushi Shindo; Satoshi Saito
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Differential pacing for distinguishing slow conduction from complete conduction block of the tricuspid-inferior vena cava isthmus after radiofrequency ablation for atrial flutter--role of transverse conduction through the crista terminalis.

Authors:  Hidezou Sugimura; Ichiro Watanabe; Yasuo Okumura; Kimie Ohkubo; Sonoko Ashino; Toshiko Nakai; Yuji Kasamaki; Satoshi Saito
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  A new and simple method for distinguishing complete from incomplete block through the cavotricuspid isthmus.

Authors:  Gabriel Laurent; Alexandra Bourcier; Géraldine Bertaux; Stéphane Fromentin; Michel Fraison; Stéphanie Gonzalez; François Saint Pierre; Jean Eric Wolf
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Predictors of acute inefficacy and the radiofrequency energy time required for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation.

Authors:  Jordi Pérez-Rodon; Julian Rodriguez-García; Axel Sarrias-Merce; Nuria Rivas-Gandara; Ivo Roca-Luque; Jaume Francisco-Pascual; Alba Santos-Ortega; Gabriel Martín-Sánchez; Ignacio Ferreira-González; Jose Rodríguez-Palomares; Artur Evangelista-Masip; David García-Dorado; Àngel Moya-Mitjans
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Multidetector 16-slice CT scan evaluation of cavotricuspid isthmus anatomy before radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Sébastien Knecht; José Castro-Rodriguez; Thierry Verbeet; Nasroola Damry; Marielle Morissens; Emmanuel Tran-Ngoc; Béatrice Peperstraete; Valentin Tatnga; Merieme Elkholti; Pierre Decoodt
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Typical Atrial Flutter - When Do You Say You Have Got It.

Authors:  Michaël Peyrol; Pascal Sbragia
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-10-06

8.  Electrogram characteristics of the coronary sinus in cases requiring epicardial ablation within the coronary sinus for creating a conduction block at the left lateral mitral isthmus.

Authors:  Daisuke Sato; Hiroki Mani; Yu Makihara; Hiroki Kitajima; Yuji Nishikawa; Seno Keitaro; Yeong-Hwa Chun
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Can right ventricular pacing be useful in the assessment of cavo-tricuspid isthumus block?

Authors:  Gennaro Miracapillo; Alessandro Costoli; Luigi Addonisio; Marco Breschi; Silva Severi
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2008-11-01

10.  Simple method of counterclockwise isthmus conduction block by comparing double potentials and flutter cycle length.

Authors:  Kyoung-Suk Rhee; Keun-Sang Kwon; Sun Hwa Lee; Kang-Hyu Lee; Sang Rok Lee; Jei Keon Chae; Won-Ho Kim; Jae-Ki Ko; Gi-Byoung Nam; Kee-Joon Choi; You-Ho Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 3.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.