Literature DB >> 11004067

Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid?

C Keller1, J Brimacombe, A Kleinsasser, A Loeckinger.   

Abstract

In this randomized, cross-over cadaver study, we determined whether a new airway device, the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA; Laryngeal Mask Company, Henley-on-Thames, UK), prevents aspiration of regurgitated fluid. We studied five male and five female cadavers (6-24 h postmortem). The infusion set of a pressure-controlled, continuous flow pump was inserted into the upper esophagus and ligated into place. Esophageal pressure (EP) was increased in 2-cm H(2)O increments. This was performed without an airway device (control) and over a range of cuff volumes (0-40 mL) for the classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA), the PLMA with the drainage tube clamped (PLMA clamped) and unclamped (PLMA unclamped). The EP at which fluid was first seen with a fiberoptic scope in the hypopharynx (control), above or below the cuff, or in the drainage tube, was noted. Mean EP at which fluid was seen without any airway device was 9 (range 8-10) cm H(2)O. EP at which fluid was seen was always higher for the PLMA clamped and LMA compared with the control (all, P<0.0001). The mean EP at which fluid was seen for the PLMA unclamped was similar to the control at 10 (range 8-13) cm H(2)O. For the PLMA unclamped, fluid appeared from the drainage tube in all cadavers at 10-40 mL cuff volume and in 8 of 10 cadavers at zero cuff volume. Mean EP at which fluid was seen above the cuff was similar for the PLMA clamped and LMA at 0-30 mL cuff volume, but was higher for PLMA clamped at 40-mL cuff volume (81 vs 48 cm H(2)O, P = 0.006). Mean EP at which fluid was seen below the cuff was similar at 0-10 mL cuff volume, but was higher for the PLMA clamped at 20, 30, and 40 mL cuff volume (62, 68, 73 vs. 46, 46, 46 cm H(2)O, respectively, P<0.04). For the PLMA clamped and the LMA, fluid appeared simultaneously above and below the cuff at all cuff volumes. We concluded that in the cadaver model, the correctly placed PLMA allows fluid in the esophagus to bypass the pharynx and mouth when the drainage tube is open. Both the LMA, and PLMA with a closed drainage tube, attenuate liquid flow between the esophagus and pharynx. This may have implications for airway protection in unconscious patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11004067     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  16 in total

1.  Oral gastric tube-guided insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask is an easy and noninvasive method for less experienced users.

Authors:  Takako Nagata; Yoshihiko Kishi; Hironobu Tanigami; Yuki Hiuge; Shunji Sonoda; Yoshifumi Ohashi; Kiyokazu Kagawa; Azusa Ushioda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  [Methods of airway management in prehospital emergency medicine].

Authors:  W Keul; M Bernhard; A Völkl; R Gust; A Gries
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Securing the prehospital airway: a comparison of laryngeal mask insertion and endotracheal intubation by UK paramedics.

Authors:  C D Deakin; R Peters; P Tomlinson; M Cassidy
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  [Airway management].

Authors:  G Schälte; S Rex; D Henzler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [Supraglottic airway devices in emergency medicine : impact of gastric drainage].

Authors:  V Mann; S T Mann; E Alejandre-Lafont; R Röhrig; M A Weigand; M Müller
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  [Use of the size 3 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Results of a randomized crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway].

Authors:  K Goldmann; C Roettger; H Wulf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  [Clinical use of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask in infants, children and adolescents : prospective observational survey].

Authors:  K Goldmann; A Malik; C Hechtfischer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Use of the pro-seal laryngeal mask airway facilitates percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Suman Sarkar; P Shashi; Anil Kumar Paswan; R P Anupam; S Suman; Surya Kumar Dube
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-10

9.  Techniques for the insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the Foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Mao-Kai Chen; Hung-Te Hsu; I-Cheng Lu; Chih-Kai Shih; Ya-Chun Shen; Kuang-Yi Tseng; Kuang-I Cheng
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Comparison of ventilatory efficacy and airway dynamics between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in adult patients during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Sudheesh Kannan; S S Harsoor; L Sowmiya; S S Nethra; D DevikaRani; M Sathesha
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.