Literature DB >> 11003410

Renal artery blood flow: quantification with breath-hold or respiratory triggered phase-contrast MR imaging.

M W de Haan1, M Kouwenhoven, A G Kessels, J M van Engelshoven.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of breath-hold and respiratory triggered phase-contrast (PC) MR imaging techniques in the measurement of renal artery blood flow. In 12 healthy subjects cardiac-gated PC flow measurements were obtained in the renal arteries using a breath-hold and a respiratory-triggered technique. The flow measurements were repeated in each renal artery separately. Comparison between the sum of flow measurements in the renal arteries and the difference in aortic flow measurements above and below the renal arteries served as an internal control. The flow measurements showed a good reproducibility both with the breath-hold (r=0.92, p < 0.0001) and with the respiratory-triggered (r = 0.91, p < 0.0001) technique. The validity of both methods was good and there was no statistically significant difference. Reproducible quantitative measurements of renal artery blood flow are possible with respiratory controlled, cardiac-gated, PC MR imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11003410     DOI: 10.1007/s003300000362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  9 in total

1.  Effect of protocol choice on phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance flow measurement in the ascending aorta: breath-hold and non-breath-hold.

Authors:  Michael A Bolen; Randolph M Setser; Ruvin S Gabriel; Rahul D Renapurkar; Yasmeen Tandon; Michael L Lieber; Milind Y Desai; Scott D Flamm
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI.

Authors:  Peter D Gatehouse; Jennifer Keegan; Lindsey A Crowe; Sharmeen Masood; Raad H Mohiaddin; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; David N Firmin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function by MR: why, how and when.

Authors:  Ricardo Duarte; Gabriel Fernandez
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-06-15

4.  Renal arterial blood flow measurement by breath-held MRI: Accuracy in phantom scans and reproducibility in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Samuel Dambreville; Arlene B Chapman; Vicente E Torres; Bernard F King; Ashley K Wallin; David H Frakes; Ajit P Yoganathan; Sameera R Wijayawardana; Kirk Easley; Kyongtae T Bae; Marijn E Brummer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Hemodynamic analysis of renal artery stenosis using computational fluid dynamics technology based on unenhanced steady-state free precession magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary results.

Authors:  Weisheng Zhang; Yi Qian; Jiang Lin; Peng Lv; Kaavya Karunanithi; Mengsu Zeng
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Measurement of kidney perfusion in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Antione G Schneider; Mark D Goodwin; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Inter-study reproducibility of interleaved spiral phase velocity mapping of renal artery haemodynamics.

Authors:  Jennifer Keegan; Hitesh C Patel; Robin M Simpson; Raad H Mohiaddin; David N Firmin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Feasibility of measuring renal blood flow by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  E M Spithoven; E Meijer; C Borns; W E Boertien; C A J M Gaillard; P Kappert; M J W Greuter; E van der Jagt; P Vart; P E de Jong; R T Gansevoort
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging to assess renal perfusion: a systematic review and statement paper.

Authors:  Giulia Villa; Steffen Ringgaard; Ingo Hermann; Rebecca Noble; Paolo Brambilla; Dinah S Khatir; Frank G Zöllner; Susan T Francis; Nicholas M Selby; Andrea Remuzzi; Anna Caroli
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 2.310

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.