Literature DB >> 11002594

Identification of sources of Phoenix aerosol by positive matrix factorization.

Z Ramadan1, X H Song, P K Hopke.   

Abstract

Chemical composition data for fine and coarse particles collected in Phoenix, AZ, were analyzed using positive matrix factorization (PMF). The objective was to identify the possible aerosol sources at the sampling site. PMF uses estimates of the error in the data to provide optimum data point scaling and permits a better treatment of missing and below-detection-limit values. It also applies nonnegativity constraints to the factors. Two sets of fine particle samples were collected by different samplers. Each of the resulting fine particle data sets was analyzed separately. For each fine particle data set, eight factors were obtained, identified as (1) biomass burning characterized by high concentrations of organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), and K; (2) wood burning with high concentrations of Na, K, OC, and EC; (3) motor vehicles with high concentrations of OC and EC; (4) nonferrous smelting process characterized by Cu, Zn, As, and Pb; (5) heavy-duty diesel characterized by high EC, OC, and Mn; (6) sea-salt factor dominated by Na and Cl; (7) soil with high values for Al, Si, Ca, Ti, and Fe; and (8) secondary aerosol with SO4(-2) and OC that may represent coal-fired power plant emissions. For the coarse particle samples, a five-factor model gave source profiles that are attributed to be (1) sea salt, (2) soil, (3) Fe source/motor vehicle, (4) construction (high Ca), and (5) coal-fired power plant. Regression of the PM mass against the factor scores was performed to estimate the mass contributions of the resolved sources. The major sources for the fine particles were motor vehicles, vegetation burning factors (biomass and wood burning), and coal-fired power plants. These sources contributed most of the fine aerosol mass by emitting carbonaceous particles, and they have higher contributions in winter. For the coarse particles, the major source contributions were soil and construction (high Ca). These sources also peaked in winter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11002594     DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  13 in total

1.  Fine particulate pollution in the Nanjing northern suburb during summer: composition and sources.

Authors:  Junlin An; Qing Duan; Honglei Wang; Qing Miao; Ping Shao; Jian Wang; Jianan Zou
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Occupational exposure to volatile organic compounds and aldehydes in the U.S. trucking industry.

Authors:  M E Davis; A P Blicharz; J E Hart; F Laden; E Garshick; T J Smith
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Source apportionment of particulate matter in a large city of southeastern Po Valley (Bologna, Italy).

Authors:  L Tositti; E Brattich; M Masiol; D Baldacci; D Ceccato; S Parmeggiani; M Stracquadanio; S Zappoli
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Source apportionment of ambient fine particle size distribution using positive matrix factorization in Erfurt, Germany.

Authors:  Wei Yue; Matthias Stölzel; Josef Cyrys; Mike Pitz; Joachim Heinrich; Wolfgang G Kreyling; H-Erich Wichmann; Annette Peters; Sheng Wang; Philip K Hopke
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Assessment of the sources of suspended particulate matter aerosol using US EPA PMF 3.0.

Authors:  Md Firoz Khan; Koichiro Hirano; Shigeki Masunaga
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  UNMIX modeling of ambient PM(2.5) near an interstate highway in Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Authors:  Shaohua Hu; Rafael McDonald; Dainius Martuzevicius; Pratim Biswas; Sergey A Grinshpun; Anna Kelley; Tiina Reponen; James Lockey; Grace Lemasters
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Characteristics of water-soluble organic acids in PM2.5 during haze and Chinese Spring Festival in winter of Jinan, China: concentrations, formations, and source apportionments.

Authors:  Shuting Tang; Xuehua Zhou; Jingzhu Zhang; Likun Xue; Yuanyuan Luo; Jie Song; Wenxing Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Source apportionment and location by selective wind sampling and Positive Matrix Factorization.

Authors:  Elisa Venturini; Ivano Vassura; Simona Raffo; Laura Ferroni; Elena Bernardi; Fabrizio Passarini
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  A Bayesian Multivariate Receptor Model for Estimating Source Contributions to Particulate Matter Pollution using National Databases.

Authors:  Amber J Hackstadt; Roger D Peng
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Influence of organic and inorganic markers in the source apportionment of airborne PM10 in Zaragoza (Spain) by two receptor models.

Authors:  M S Callén; J M López; A M Mastral
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.