Literature DB >> 11000499

Fetal biometric parameters, twin type and birth weight difference. A longitudinal study.

C Charlemaine1, M Duyme, Y Ville, A Aurengo, R Tremblay, R Frydman, J C Pons.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between twin type, divided by zygosity, chorionicity, and birth weight difference [more or less than 15% intertwin weight difference at delivery] on fetal biometric measurements, including biparietal diameter, transverse abdominal diameter, head and abdominal circumferences (AC) and head and abdominal areas, femur length (FL), transverse cerebellar diameter, cerebellar circumference and cerebellar area at 18, 23, 28 and 32 weeks of gestational age. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective and longitudinal study was done on 75 twin pairs that did not present the twin-twin transfusion syndrome (150 fetuses) divided into birth weight difference group I (<15%) and group II (>/=15%). The twin pairs were divided into three groups: dizygotic, monochorionic, and dichorionic-monozygotic. In each group the differences in various ultrasound indices were evaluated in reference to discordant growth or concordant growth.
RESULTS: In our sample, there were no monozygotic twin pairs with dichorionic placentation with a birth weight difference of more than 15%. Significant associations of group and gestational age were found in dizygotic and monochorionic twins. Intrapair differences were significantly higher in group II (>/=15%) than in group I (<15%) for all fetal parameters studied except for AC, abdominal area and all cerebellar parameters. The value of these discrepancies increased according to gestational age except for FL. Significant interactions between group and zygosity type indicated that intrapair FL differences were more associated with group in monochorionic twins, whereas intrapair transverse cerebellar diameter differences were more associated with group in dizygotic twins.
CONCLUSION: Our data show that most fetal biometric parameters are associated with birth weight discordancy. Abdominal area could be a relevant marker for twins with obstetric complications. Note that this is the first research that has studied a twin sample divided by both twin type and birth weight group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11000499     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00239-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  The epigenesis of planum temporale asymmetry in twins.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Christiana M Leonard; Elizabeth A Molloy; Jonathan Blumenthal; Alex Zijdenbos; Jay N Giedd
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Exploiting human anatomical variability as a link between genome and cognome.

Authors:  C M Leonard; M A Eckert; J M Kuldau
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.449

3.  Discordance of prenatal and neonatal brain development in twins.

Authors:  Niyati Mukherjee; Chaeryon Kang; Honor M Wolfe; Barbara S Hertzberg; J Keith Smith; Weili Lin; Guido Gerig; Robert M Hamer; John H Gilmore
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Relationship between sonographic umbilical cord size and gestational age among pregnant women in Enugu, Nigeria.

Authors:  Charles Eze; Mabel Ugwuja; Cletus Eze; George Ugwu; Kennedy Agwuna
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.927

5.  Optimal threshold for birth weight discordance: Does knowledge of chorionicity matter?

Authors:  S Jahanfar; K Lim; E Oviedo-Joekes
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Factors affecting yawning frequencies in preterm neonates.

Authors:  Damiano Menin; Elisa Ballardini; Roberta Panebianco; Giampaolo Garani; Caterina Borgna-Pignatti; Harriet Oster; Marco Dondi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.