Literature DB >> 11000171

MR imaging of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft.

L K Horton1, J A Jacobson, J Lin, C W Hayes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the MR imaging findings that differentiate intact anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft, partial-thickness tear, and full-thickness tear, using arthroscopy as the gold standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen consecutive MR imaging examinations were retrospectively and independently evaluated by two musculoskeletal radiologists for primary signs (graft signal, orientation, fiber continuity, complete discontinuity, and thickness) and secondary signs (anterior tibial translation, uncovered posterior horn lateral meniscus, posterior cruciate ligament hyperbuckling, and abnormal posterior cruciate ligament line) of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft tear in 15 patients with follow-up arthroscopy. Results were compared with arthroscopy, and both receiver operating characteristic curves and kappa values for interobserver variability were calculated.
RESULTS: Arthroscopy revealed four full-thickness graft tears, seven partial-thickness tears, and five intact grafts. Of the primary signs, graft fiber continuity in the coronal plane and 100% graft thickness in the sagittal or coronal plane were most valuable in excluding full-thickness tear. Complete discontinuous graft in the coronal plane also was valuable in diagnosis of full-thickness tear. Of the secondary signs, anterior tibial translation and uncovered posterior horn lateral meniscus assisted in differentiating graft tear (partial or full thickness) from intact graft. The other primary and secondary signs were less valuable. Kappa values were highest for graft fiber continuity and graft discontinuity in the coronal plane.
CONCLUSION: Full-thickness anterior cruciate ligament graft tear can be differentiated from partial-thickness tear or intact graft by evaluating for graft fiber continuity (coronal plane), complete graft discontinuity (coronal plane), and graft thickness (coronal or sagittal plane).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11000171     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.4.1751091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  14 in total

1.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable transfemoral fixation at 5-year follow-up: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Sven Nebelung; Gregor Deitmer; Rolf Gebing; Frank Reichwein; Wolfgang Nebelung
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  T2 black lesions on routine knee MRI: differential considerations.

Authors:  Vibhor Wadhwa; Gina Cho; Daniel Moore; Parham Pezeshk; Katherine Coyner; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Post-operative imaging of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques across the spectrum of skeletal maturity.

Authors:  Andrew M Zbojniewicz; Arthur B Meyers; Eric J Wall
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  [MRI after meniscus and cruciate ligament surgery].

Authors:  J Kramer; M Breitenseher; A Stöger; H Huber; A Scheurecker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee: ligaments, menisci, and articular cartilage.

Authors:  Lawrence M White; Josef Kramer; Michael P Recht
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of surgically confirmed anterior cruciate ligament graft disruption.

Authors:  Mark S Collins; Kenneth P Unruh; Jeffrey R Bond; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MR imaging findings.

Authors:  M Zappia; R Capasso; D Berritto; N Maggialetti; C Varelli; G D'Agosto; M T Martino; M Carbone; L Brunese
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-02-14

8.  Lower patient-reported function at 2 years is associated with elevated knee cartilage T1rho and T2 relaxation times at 5 years in young athletes after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew P Ithurburn; Andrew M Zbojniewicz; Staci Thomas; Kevin D Evans; Michael L Pennell; Robert A Magnussen; Mark V Paterno; Laura C Schmitt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  MR imaging of stable posterior cruciate ligament grafts in 21 arthroscopically proven cases.

Authors:  Young Cheol Yoon; Hye Won Chung; Jin Hwan Ahn
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.

Authors:  Thomas W Hash
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.