Literature DB >> 10999916

Use of unequal randomisation to aid the economic efficiency of clinical trials.

D J Torgerson1, M K Campbell.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2000        PMID： 10999916      PMCID： PMC1127870          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.321.7263.759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Economics notes: cost effectiveness calculations and sample size.

Authors:  D J Torgerson; M K Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-16

2.  Unequal randomisation can improve the economic efficiency of clinical trials.

Authors:  D Torgerson; M Campbell
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-04

3.  Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-11-19       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Vitamin D3 and calcium to prevent hip fractures in elderly women.

Authors:  M C Chapuy; M E Arlot; F Duboeuf; J Brun; B Crouzet; S Arnaud; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-12-03       Impact factor: 91.245
  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  Improving the reporting of adverse drug reactions: a cluster-randomized trial among pharmacists in Portugal.

Authors:  Maria T Herdeiro; Jorge Polónia; Juan J Gestal-Otero; Adolfo Figueiras
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness-based stress reduction to manage affective symptoms and improve quality of life in gay men living with HIV.

Authors:  Bill Gayner; Mary Jane Esplen; Peter DeRoche; Jiahui Wong; Scott Bishop; Lynn Kavanagh; Kate Butler
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-05-20

3.  Comparison of three tests of homogeneity of odds ratios in multicenter trials with unequal sample sizes within and among centers.

Authors:  Zahra Bagheri; Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi; Peyman Jafari
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Sequential boundaries approach in clinical trials with unequal allocation ratios.

Authors:  Peyman Jafari; Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi; Javad Behboodian
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  The effect of improving task representativeness on capturing nurses' risk assessment judgements: a comparison of written case simulations and physical simulations.

Authors:  Huiqin Yang; Carl Thompson; Robert M Hamm; Martin Bland; Alison Foster
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  The effect of clinical experience, judgment task difficulty and time pressure on nurses' confidence calibration in a high fidelity clinical simulation.

Authors:  Huiqin Yang; Carl Thompson; Martin Bland
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Evaluation of biases present in the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jane Candlish; Alexander Pate; Matthew Sperrin; Tjeerd van Staa
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 8.  Heterogeneous perception of the ethical legitimacy of unbalanced randomization by institutional review board members: a clinical vignette-based survey.

Authors:  Clarisse Dibao-Dina; Agnès Caille; Bruno Giraudeau
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.279
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.