Literature DB >> 10995606

Expanding the view of scholarship: introduction.

D S Beattie1.   

Abstract

The Association of American Medical Colleges' Council of Academic Societies (CAS) has a long-standing interest in scholarship as it relates to research, education, and service, the traditional definition of the activities of medical school. The work of Ernest Boyer and Charles Glassick is highly respected for redefining scholarship and conceiving how scholarship as thus defined can be assessed. Because their ideas have been applied in other areas of the academy but not widely in medical faculties, the CAS Task Force on Scholarship collected a special set of papers on Boyer's four areas of scholarship as applied to medical school, including case studies and the perspective from the university. The four areas of scholarship defined by Boyer and Glassick are the scholarship of discovery, the scholarship of integration, the scholarship of application, and the scholarship of teaching. The scholarship of discovery-research-has for decades been the primary focus for promotion and tenure for medical school faculty, even though the faculty also had major and critical activities in the other areas of scholarship. The CAS hopes that the ideas put forth in this special theme issue will produce a continuing dialogue as faculty and administrators at medical schools reflect on the value of these different forms of scholarship, their application by medical school faculty, and their contributions to the individual missions of each medical school and teaching hospital. In addition, these articles will stimulate continuing discussions that will definite equitable methods for the continued assessment of the scholarly accomplishments of medical school faculty.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10995606     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200009000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  8 in total

Review 1.  Barriers to scholarship in dentistry, medicine, nursing, and pharmacy practice faculty.

Authors:  Andrea L Smesny; Jennifer S Williams; Gayle A Brazeau; Robert J Weber; Hewitt W Matthews; Sudip K Das
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Faculty perceptions of how community-engaged research is valued in tenure, promotion, and retention decisions.

Authors:  Kathleen M Nokes; David A Nelson; Mary Anne McDonald; Karen Hacker; Jacquelyn Gosse; Becky Sanford; Shannon Opel
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 3.  Updated guidelines for manuscripts describing instructional design and assessment: the IDEAS format.

Authors:  Therese Poirier; Michael Crouch; George MacKinnon; Reza Mehvar; Mary Monk-Tutor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 4.  Educational Scholarship and Technology: Resources for a Changing Undergraduate Medical Education Curriculum.

Authors:  Brandon N Kyle; Irma Corral; Nadyah Janine John; P G Shelton
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2017-06

5.  The wisdom, the will, and the wallet: leadership on behalf of kids and families.

Authors:  Tina L Cheng
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.107

6.  Creating educational leaders: experiences with two education fellowships in emergency medicine.

Authors:  Lalena M Yarris; Wendy C Coates
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Pride and prejudice - What can we learn from peer review?

Authors:  Helen Le Sueur; Arianna Dagliati; Iain Buchan; Anthony D Whetton; Glen P Martin; Tim Dornan; Nophar Geifman
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  Applying multiple frameworks to establish effective virtual collaborative teams in academia: a review and recommendations.

Authors:  Gerald E Crites; Andrea Berry; Elissa Hall; Denise Kay; Mohammed K Khalil; Larry Hurtubise
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2020-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.