Literature DB >> 10994222

Is there a temporal basis of the word length effect? A response to Service (1998)

N Cowan1, L D Nugent, E M Elliott, T Geer.   

Abstract

Service (1998) carried out a study of the word length effect with Finnish pseudowords in which short and long pseudowords were identical except for the inclusion of certain phonemes differing only in pronunciation length, a manipulation that is impossible in English. She obtained an effect of phonemic complexity but little or no word duration effect per se--a discrepancy from the expectations generated by the well-known working memory model of Baddeley (1986). In the present study using English words, we controlled for phonemic complexity differences by using the same words for the short- and long-word sets, but with instructions inducing shorter or longer pronunciation of the words. We obtained substantial word duration effects. Concerns raised by Service are addressed, and we conclude that both duration and complexity are likely to contribute to the word length effect in serial recall.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10994222     DOI: 10.1080/713755905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  14 in total

1.  The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

Review 2.  The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory.

Authors:  M Wilson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

Review 3.  The focus of attention as observed in visual working memory tasks: making sense of competing claims.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The time-based word length effect and stimulus set specificity.

Authors:  Ian Neath; Tamra J Bireta; Aimée M Surprenant
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

5.  Backward recall and benchmark effects of working memory.

Authors:  Tamra J Bireta; Sheena E Fry; Annie Jalbert; Ian Neath; Aimée M Surprenant; Gerald Tehan; Georgina Anne Tolan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

6.  Chunk limits and length limits in immediate recall: a reconciliation.

Authors:  Zhijian Chen; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The word-length effect provides no evidence for decay in short-term memory.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

Review 8.  Decay theory of immediate memory: From Brown (1958) to today (2014).

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Working memory and the revision of syntactic and discourse ambiguities.

Authors:  William S Evans; David Caplan; Adam Ostrowski; Jennifer Michaud; Anthony J Guarino; Gloria Waters
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2014-12-08

10.  Do familiar memory items decay?

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Joshua Sandry; Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.