Literature DB >> 10993609

Endoscopic ultrasound does not accurately assess pathologic stage of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

B D Beseth1, R Bedford, W H Isacoff, E C Holmes, R B Cameron.   

Abstract

The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for initial staging of esophageal cancer is widely accepted. There is, however, considerable variability in the reported accuracy of EUS for restaging of esophageal neoplasms after neoadjuvant therapy. From June 1995 through December 1999, we prospectively studied a series of 26 patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer and were subsequently restaged by EUS before resection. Twenty-four patients had adenocarcinoma (92%), and two patients had squamous cell carcinoma (8%). EUS correctly predicted tumor stage in seven of 26 patients for an overall accuracy of 27 per cent. EUS overestimated the depth of tumor penetration in 18 patients (69%) and underestimated depth of penetration in one patient (4%). Lymph nodes were correctly staged in 15 of 26 patients for an overall accuracy of 58 per cent. Levels of sensitivity for detecting N0 and N1 disease were 44 per cent and 80 per cent respectively. Patients with a complete pathologic response were staged as T4N1 (one patient), T3N1 (three patients), T3N0 (one patient), and T2N1 (two patients). EUS cannot distinguish tumor involvement of the esophageal wall and lymph nodes from the postinflammatory changes that characterize effective neoadjuvant treatment. EUS is of limited utility in guiding clinical decision making after neoadjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10993609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  17 in total

1.  The role of endoscopic ultrasound in assessing tumor response and staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Subhasis Misra; Mark Choi; Alan S Livingstone; Dido Franceschi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Interim endoscopy results during neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer correlate with histopathological response and prognosis.

Authors:  Ulrike Heger; Franz Bader; Florian Lordick; Maria Burian; Rupert Langer; Martin Dobritz; Susanne Blank; Thomas Bruckner; Karen Becker; Ken Herrmann; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Katja Ott
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer staged with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET): can postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET predict the utility of resection?

Authors:  Arta Monir Monjazeb; Greg Riedlinger; Mebea Aklilu; Kim R Geisinger; Girish Mishra; Scott Isom; Paige Clark; Edward A Levine; A William Blackstock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Biological imaging in the assessment of neoadjuvant treatment response in esophageal cancer: a new era?

Authors:  John Th Plukker
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11

5.  Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing standard esophagectomy with chemoradiotherapy for treatment of squamous esophageal cancer: early results from the Chinese University Research Group for Esophageal Cancer (CURE).

Authors:  Philip W Y Chiu; Angus C W Chan; S F Leung; H T Leong; K H Kwong; Micheal K W Li; Alex C M Au-Yeung; Sydney C S Chung; Enders K W Ng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Predictions of Pathological Features and Recurrence Based on FDG-PET Findings of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Trimodal Therapy.

Authors:  Yoichi Hamai; Manabu Emi; Yuta Ibuki; Yuji Murakami; Ikuno Nishibuchi; Yasushi Nagata; Takaoki Furukawa; Tomoaki Kurokawa; Manato Ohsawa; Toru Yoshikawa; Morihito Okada
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CPT-11 and cisplatin downstages locally advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Elliot Newman; Stuart G Marcus; Milan Potmesil; Sanjeev Sewak; Herman Yee; Joan Sorich; Mary Hayek; Franco Muggia; Howard Hochster
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  The evaluation of esophageal adenocarcinoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Eugene Y Chang; Xin Li; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Ryan A Priest; C Kristian Enestvedt; Jingang Xu; Charles S Springer; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Prospective comparison of the perceived preoperative computed tomographic, endosonographic and histopathological stage of oesophageal cancer related to body mass indices.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; S Ashley Roberts; Jonathan D Barry; Huw Oliphant; Matthew A Morgan; Guy R J Blackshaw; Wyn G Lewis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Prospective comparison of optic versus blind endoscopic ultrasound in staging esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; Wyn G Lewis; Xavier Escofet; David Bosanquet; S Ashley Roberts
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.