UNLABELLED: To further develop our understanding of the relationship between habitual physical activity and health, research studies require a method of assessment that is objective, accurate, and noninvasive. Heart rate (HR) monitoring represents a promising tool for measurement because it is a physiological parameter that correlates well with energy expenditure (EE). However, one of the limitations of HR monitoring is that training state and individual HR characteristics can affect the HR-VO2 relationship. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between HR (beats x min(-1)) and VO2 (mL x kg(-1 x -1) min(-1)) during field- and laboratory-based moderate-intensity activities. In addition, we examined the validity of estimating EE from HR after adjusting for age and fitness. This was done by expressing the data as a percent of heart rate reserve (%HRR) and percent of VO2 reserve (%VO2R). METHODS: Sixty-one adults (18-74 yr) performed physical tasks in both a laboratory and field setting. HR and VO2 were measured continuously during the 15-min tasks. Mean values over min 5-15 were used to perform linear regression analysis on HR versus VO2. HR data were then used to predict EE (METs), using age-predicted HRmax and estimated VO2max. RESULTS: The correlation between HR and VO2 was r = 0.68, with HR accounting for 47% of the variability in VO2. After adjusting for age and fitness level, HR was an accurate predictor of EE (r = 0.87, SEE = 0.76 METs). CONCLUSION: This method of analyzing HR data could allow researchers to more accurately quantify physical activity in free-living individuals.
UNLABELLED: To further develop our understanding of the relationship between habitual physical activity and health, research studies require a method of assessment that is objective, accurate, and noninvasive. Heart rate (HR) monitoring represents a promising tool for measurement because it is a physiological parameter that correlates well with energy expenditure (EE). However, one of the limitations of HR monitoring is that training state and individual HR characteristics can affect the HR-VO2 relationship. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between HR (beats x min(-1)) and VO2 (mL x kg(-1 x -1) min(-1)) during field- and laboratory-based moderate-intensity activities. In addition, we examined the validity of estimating EE from HR after adjusting for age and fitness. This was done by expressing the data as a percent of heart rate reserve (%HRR) and percent of VO2 reserve (%VO2R). METHODS: Sixty-one adults (18-74 yr) performed physical tasks in both a laboratory and field setting. HR and VO2 were measured continuously during the 15-min tasks. Mean values over min 5-15 were used to perform linear regression analysis on HR versus VO2. HR data were then used to predict EE (METs), using age-predicted HRmax and estimated VO2max. RESULTS: The correlation between HR and VO2 was r = 0.68, with HR accounting for 47% of the variability in VO2. After adjusting for age and fitness level, HR was an accurate predictor of EE (r = 0.87, SEE = 0.76 METs). CONCLUSION: This method of analyzing HR data could allow researchers to more accurately quantify physical activity in free-living individuals.
Authors: B Adar Emken; Ming Li; Gautam Thatte; Sangwon Lee; Murali Annavaram; Urbashi Mitra; Shrikanth Narayanan; Donna Spruijt-Metz Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2011-05-11
Authors: Simon M Gunn; Grant E van der Ploeg; Robert T Withers; Christopher J Gore; Neville Owen; Adrian E Bauman; John Cormack Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2003-09-04 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Colin J Boyd; Norah J Macmillan; Alex E Green; Jon E D Ross; David B Thorp; Brendon J Gurd Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2012-09-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Kirk I Erickson; Michelle W Voss; Ruchika Shaurya Prakash; Chandramallika Basak; Amanda Szabo; Laura Chaddock; Jennifer S Kim; Susie Heo; Heloisa Alves; Siobhan M White; Thomas R Wojcicki; Emily Mailey; Victoria J Vieira; Stephen A Martin; Brandt D Pence; Jeffrey A Woods; Edward McAuley; Arthur F Kramer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kelem Vedovelli; Bruno Lima Giacobbo; Márcio Silveira Corrêa; Andréa Wieck; Irani Iracema de Lima Argimon; Elke Bromberg Journal: Geroscience Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Michelle W Voss; Ruchika S Prakash; Kirk I Erickson; Chandramallika Basak; Laura Chaddock; Jennifer S Kim; Heloisa Alves; Susie Heo; Amanda N Szabo; Siobhan M White; Thomas R Wójcicki; Emily L Mailey; Neha Gothe; Erin A Olson; Edward McAuley; Arthur F Kramer Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2010-08-26 Impact factor: 5.750