Literature DB >> 10992034

The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: X-ray image intensifiers for fluoroscopy.

J Wang1, T J Blackburn.   

Abstract

The x-ray image intensifier converts the transmitted x rays into a brightened, visible light image. Within an image intensifier, the input phosphor converts the x-ray photons to light photons, which are then converted to photoelectrons within the photocathode. The electrons are accelerated and focused by a series of electrodes striking the output phosphor, which converts the accelerated electrons into light photons that may be captured by various imaging devices. Through this process, several thousand light photons are produced for each x-ray photon reaching the input phosphor. Most modern image intensifiers use cesium iodide for the input phosphor because it has a high absorption efficiency and thus decreases patient dose. Image intensifiers come in various sizes, most having more than one input image size or magnification mode. Modern image intensifiers are specified by conversion factors, which is the measure of how efficiently an image intensifier converts x rays to light. Because of design restrictions, image intensifiers are subject to inherent and induced artifacts that contribute to image degradation. Both spatial and contrast resolution gradually decrease during the lifetime of the image intensifier because the brightness gain of an image intensifier decreases with time as the phosphor ages. A well-run quality control program for the image intensifier is needed to detect the inevitable changes in settings before they appear on clinical images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10992034     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.20.5.g00se181471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  8 in total

1.  X-ray fluoroscopy noise modeling for filter design.

Authors:  M Cesarelli; P Bifulco; T Cerciello; M Romano; L Paura
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality.

Authors:  Andrew G Davies; Arnold R Cowen; Stephen M Kengyelics; Janet Moore; Mohan U Sivananthan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Influence of Shod and Barefoot Running on the In Vivo Kinematics of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint.

Authors:  Faning Zhang; Dongqiang Ye; Xini Zhang; Xiaole Sun; Shen Zhang; Shaobai Wang; Weijie Fu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-16

4.  Biplanar Videoradiography to Study the Wrist and Distal Radioulnar Joints.

Authors:  Bardiya Akhbari; Amy M Morton; Douglas C Moore; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  A preliminary case study of the effect of shoe-wearing on the biomechanics of a horse's foot.

Authors:  Olga Panagiotopoulou; Jeffery W Rankin; Stephen M Gatesy; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  Storage Phosphors for Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Paul Leblans; Dirk Vandenbroucke; Peter Willems
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  C-Arm Image-Based Surgical Path Planning Method for Distal Locking of Intramedullary Nails.

Authors:  Wei-En Hsu; Ching-Hsiao Yu; Chih-Ju Chang; Hung-Kang Wu; Tsong-Han Yu; Ching-Shiow Tseng
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 1.781

8.  Effects of Barefoot and Shod on the In Vivo Kinematics of Medial Longitudinal Arch During Running Based on a High-Speed Dual Fluoroscopic Imaging System.

Authors:  Wanyan Su; Shen Zhang; Dongqiang Ye; Xiaole Sun; Xini Zhang; Weijie Fu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.