Literature DB >> 10990109

Impact of delayed repair and elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on survival of antenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia: first application of these strategies in the more "severe" subgroup of antenatally diagnosed newborns.

L Desfrere1, P H Jarreau, M Dommergues, A Brunhes, P Hubert, C Nihoul-Fekete, P Mussat, G Moriette.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: a) To analyze the influence of a new management strategy on the outcome of neonates with antenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH); b) to determine early prognosis respiratory factors with the new strategy.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Level III perinatal center. PATIENTS AND
METHOD: Between 1985 and 1997, 51 consecutive neonates with antenatally diagnosed CDH were admitted to our level III neonatal intensive care unit. Before 1992 (period 1; n = 19), we used conventional mechanical ventilation and early surgery requiring transfer. Since 1992 (period 2; n = 32), we prospectively tested a new approach including (a) systematically use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) regardless of the initial clinical severity, (b) delayed surgery following stabilization requiring transfer to a different surgical unit, but (c) no transfer of unstable patients with surgery under HFOV in our neonatal intensive care unit (n = 10). The two cohorts were comparable in terms of potential ante and postnatal prognostic indicators.
RESULTS: Survival was improved with the new strategy: 21/32 (66%) vs. 5/19 (26%); P < 0.02. This improvement between periods 1 and 2 was due to a decrease in both preoperative and postoperative deaths in the later period. The better survival during period 2 was associated with the appearance of very late deaths, frequent pleural effusions, and the survival of more severe forms having evolved to a chronic respiratory insufficiency. Survivors were ventilated for longer time with longer duration of oxygen supplementation. The best oxygenation index (OI), alveolar arterial difference and oscillation amplitude (P/P) during the first 24 h, but not the best PaCO2, were the most reliable prognostic indicators during period 2. An OI < or = 10 with a P/P < or = 55 cmH2O was associated with a very good prognosis (94% survival).
CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of antenatally diagnosed CDH was improved by systematic HFOV on admission, no systematic transfer, and delayed surgery. This improvement is associated with modification of postnatal outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10990109     DOI: 10.1007/s001340051284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  12 in total

1.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: outcome in small centres.

Authors:  S Cantagrel; F Talbourdel; H Lardy; M Robert; J Laugier
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Preliminary observations of the use of high-frequency jet ventilation as rescue therapy in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Michael A Kuluz; P Brian Smith; Sarah P Mears; Jennifer R Benjamin; Elisabeth T Tracy; W Lee Williford; Ronald N Goldberg; Henry E Rice; C Michael Cotten
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Early experience with thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias in pediatric age group: results and lessons learned.

Authors:  Rahul Kumar Gupta; Sandesh V Parelkar; Sanjay N Oak; Beejal Sanghvi; Advait Prakash; Mitesh Bachani; Rajashekhar Patil
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  The immediate and long-term outcomes of newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Stanley J Crankson; Saud A Al Jadaan; Mohammed A Namshan; Abdullah A Al-Rabeeah; Omar Oda
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Improvement in the outcome of patients with antenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia using gentle ventilation and circulatory stabilization.

Authors:  Kouji Masumoto; Risa Teshiba; Genshiro Esumi; Kouji Nagata; Yasushi Takahata; Shunji Hikino; Toshiro Hara; Satoshi Hojo; Kiyomi Tsukimori; Norio Wake; Naoko Kinukawa; Tomoaki Taguchi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 6.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: current status and review of the literature.

Authors:  Anthony S de Buys Roessingh; Anh Tuan Dinh-Xuan
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Reduction in ventilator-induced lung injury improves outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia?

Authors:  Geraldine Yin Taeng Ng; Catherine Derry; Louise Marston; Moti Choudhury; Keith Holmes; Sandra Adamson Calvert
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Trends in the treatment and outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia over the last decade.

Authors:  Massimo Garriboli; Johannes Wolfgang Duess; Elke Ruttenstock; Mark Bishay; Simon Eaton; Paolo De Coppi; Prem Puri; Michael E Höllwarth; Agostino Pierro
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Assessing health-related quality-of-life changes in informal caregivers: an evaluation in parents of children with major congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Marten J Poley; Werner B F Brouwer; N Job A van Exel; Dick Tibboel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a narrative review of controversies in neonatal management.

Authors:  Michelle J Yang; Katie W Russell; Bradley A Yoder; Stephen J Fenton
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.