Literature DB >> 10986712

[Computer-assisted spine surgery: principles, technique, results and perspectives].

D Schlenzka1, T Laine, T Lund.   

Abstract

Computer-assisted techniques were introduced in spine surgery in the 1990s to improve accuracy and safety of operative procedures. Several reports on clinical results of computer-aided screw insertion in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine as well as the sacro-iliac joints are available. They show a significant decrease of screw malplacement rates as compared to conventional insertion techniques. The quality of preoperative planning of spinal procedures has improved markedly by using computer navigation systems. Drawbacks, reliability problems, and safety issues of computer navigation are discussed. In the near future, the use of computer guidance for minimally invasive and percutaneous spine procedures is expected.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10986712     DOI: 10.1007/s001320050508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  9 in total

1.  [Accuracy of CT-based navitation of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine compared with conventional technique].

Authors:  K J Schnake; B König; U Berth; R J Schroeder; F Kandziora; U Stöckle; M Raschke; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Acetabular component positioning using anatomic landmarks of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Yong-Chan Ha; Jeong Joon Yoo; Young-Kyun Lee; Jin Young Kim; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Computer-assisted screw placement into the posterior pelvic ring: assessment of different navigated procedures in a cadaver trial].

Authors:  D Briem; J M Rueger; P G C Begemann; Z Halata; T Bock; W Linhart; J Windolf
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  Comparison of two novel fluoroscopy-based stereotactic methods for cervical pedicle screw placement and review of the literature.

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Bach; L Audigé; R Bale; R Attal; M Blauth; F Magerl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  [Best matching. Experimental comparison of different matching procedures for use in computer navigation].

Authors:  A Schäffler; B König; N P Haas; U Stöckle
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Evaluation of 2D and 3D navigation for iliosacral screw fixation.

Authors:  Daniel Behrendt; Maria Mütze; Hanno Steinke; Martin Koestler; Christoph Josten; Jörg Böhme
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  [Electromagnetic navigation of transpedicular punctures: more precise than the standard?].

Authors:  J A K Ohnsorge; K Kowalski; P Bruners; M Weisskopf; M Lühmann; T Penzkofer; U Maus
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  [Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thorax and lumbar spine. Part II: surgical treatment and radiological findings].

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Knop; R Beisse; L Audigé; F Kandziora; A Pizanis; R Pranzl; E Gercek; M Schultheiss; A Weckbach; V Bühren; M Blauth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Novel MIS 3D NAV Single Step Pedicle Screw System (SSPSS): Workflow, Accuracy and Initial Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Franziska A Schmidt; Hervé M Lekuya; Sertac Kirnaz; Robert Nick Hernandez; Ibrahim Hussain; Louis Chang; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Christoph Wipplinger; Cameron Rawanduzy; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-01-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.