Literature DB >> 10986542

Sample size calculations with compliance information.

T Sato1.   

Abstract

In randomized clinical trials, non-compliance will lead to the loss of power in the standard intention-to-treat analysis and one should account for this in sample size calculations. In this paper a new sample size formula for a binary outcome is proposed in which compliance information is considered. The proposed method is based purely on the treatment randomization. We compare it to the conventional sample size calculation method based on the two independent binomial distributions assumption. We examine 3100 combinations of risks of control group (baseline risks), treatment effects (risk differences), compliances in the test treatment group and the control treatment group, test sizes and powers. We found that, compared to the conventional method, the proposed method gives similar sample sizes for baseline risks 0.4-0.6, larger sample sizes for baseline risks less than 0.4, and smaller sample sizes for baseline risks greater than 0.6 when the true risk difference is negative.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10986542     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20001015)19:19<2689::aid-sim555>3.0.co;2-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  2 in total

1.  A randomized clinical trial of home-based exercise combined with a slight caloric restriction on obesity prevention among women.

Authors:  Mauro Felippe Felix Mediano; José Silvio de Oliveira Barbosa; Aníbal Sanchez Moura; Walter C Willett; Rosely Sichieri
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Cohort Multiple Randomised Controlled Trials (cmRCT) design: efficient but biased? A simulation study to evaluate the feasibility of the Cluster cmRCT design.

Authors:  Alexander Pate; Jane Candlish; Matthew Sperrin; Tjeerd Pieter Van Staa
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.615

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.