Literature DB >> 10983707

Ligament mechanics during three degree-of-freedom motion at the acromioclavicular joint.

R E Debski1, I M Parsons, J Fenwick, A Vangura.   

Abstract

The development of effective treatment and reconstruction procedures for injuries to the soft tissues around the acromioclavicular (AC) joint relies on a comprehensive understanding of overall joint function. The objective of this study was to determine the magnitude and direction of the in situ forces in the AC capsular and coracoclavicular ligaments as well as the resulting joint kinematics during application of three external loading conditions while allowing three degree-of-freedom joint motion. A robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system was utilized to determine the in situ forces in the soft tissue structures and the resulting joint kinematics. The clavicle translated 5.1+/-2.0, 5.6+/-2.2, and 4.2+/-1.9 mm during application of a 70 N load in the anterior, posterior, and superior directions, respectively, representing almost a 50% increase over previous studies using similar load magnitudes. In response to an anterior load, the magnitude of in situ force in the superior AC ligament (35+/-18 N) was found to be greater (p<0.05) than the force in the trapezoid and conoid ligaments. In contrast, the magnitude of in situ force in the conoid (49+/-22 N) was significantly greater (p<0.05) than all other ligaments in response to a superior load. Additionally, the directions of the force vector representing the conoid and trapezoid were different, being located in opposing quadrants of the posterior axis of the scapula with this loading condition. Our data suggest that the kinematic constraints placed on the AC joint during loading affect the resulting joint motion and that the magnitude and direction of force in each ligament are affected by the coupled motions that occur. Based on the differences in magnitude and direction of the in situ force in the coracoclavicular ligaments with each loading condition, surgical procedures should reconstruct these ligaments in a more anatomical manner or treat them separately to prevent joint degeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10983707     DOI: 10.1114/1.1304848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  20 in total

1.  Biomechanical properties of repairs for dislocated AC joints using suture button systems with integrated tendon augmentation.

Authors:  Knut Beitzel; Elifho Obopilwe; David M Chowaniec; Michael D Nowak; Bryan T Hanypsiak; James J Guerra; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Measure of horizontal and vertical displacement of the acromioclavicular joint after cutting ligament using X-ray and opto-electronic system.

Authors:  Goulven Rochcongar; Sébastien Emily; Benoit Lebel; Vincent Pineau; Gilles Burdin; Christophe Hulet
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Arthroscopically assisted anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using tendon graft.

Authors:  Yon-Sik Yoo; Young-Jin Seo; Kyu-Cheol Noh; Bishu Prasad Patro; Do-Young Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison of tendon graft repairs to a synthetic double bundle augmentation.

Authors:  Mathias Wellmann; Jan P Kempka; Steffen Schanz; Thore Zantop; Hazibullah Waizy; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  [Minimally Invasive Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction (MINAR)].

Authors:  Wolf Petersen; Mathias Wellmann; Steffen Rosslenbroich; Thore Zantop
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  Superior clavicle drilling points and fluoroscopic inclination for anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tetsuya Takenaga; Masahito Yoshida; Richard E Debski; Freddie H Fu; Volker Musahl; Albert Lin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Ryan J Warth; Frank Martetschläger; Trevor R Gaskill; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-03

Review 8.  [Arthroscopically assisted techniques for treatment of acute and chronic acromioclavicular joint injuries].

Authors:  S Braun; A B Imhoff; F Martetschläger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Triple endobuttton technique for the treatment of acute complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations: preliminary results.

Authors:  Hai-Feng Wei; Yun-Feng Chen; Bing-Fang Zeng; Chang-Qing Zhang; Yi-Min Chai; Hai-Ming Wang; Ye Lu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Acromioclavicular joint instability: anatomy, biomechanics and evaluation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Carmine DE Ieso; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.