OBJECTIVE: Three of the Smoke-Free Families projects incorporated motivational interviewing (MI) into prenatal smoking cessation interventions. This paper describes the process involved in training healthcare providers to use MI and the issues encountered in implementing the protocols. DESIGN: Health care providers at all three sites attended local training workshops in which they learned to apply the basics of MI to their study protocol. All sites followed a similar outline and schedule for training and monitoring. SETTINGS: The MI interventions were delivered through home visits in Boston, Massachusetts; phone based counselling calls to patients' homes in Southern California; and in urban and rural prenatal clinics throughout East Texas. PARTICIPANTS: Public health nurse and social work case managers, who were already employed by health care agencies, delivered the MI interventions. MEASURES: Pre- and postintervention assessments and feedback from trainers and investigators at all three sites. RESULTS: Providers were enthusiastic about the training workshops, which they rated as effective in preparing them to deliver the intervention. Barriers to implementation included difficulty in contacting patients and competing demands on providers' time. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting initial training for providers is the first step in developing skills to deliver motivational interventions. Additional time and resources are needed for ongoing skill building and monitoring of intervention delivery.
OBJECTIVE: Three of the Smoke-Free Families projects incorporated motivational interviewing (MI) into prenatal smoking cessation interventions. This paper describes the process involved in training healthcare providers to use MI and the issues encountered in implementing the protocols. DESIGN: Health care providers at all three sites attended local training workshops in which they learned to apply the basics of MI to their study protocol. All sites followed a similar outline and schedule for training and monitoring. SETTINGS: The MI interventions were delivered through home visits in Boston, Massachusetts; phone based counselling calls to patients' homes in Southern California; and in urban and rural prenatal clinics throughout East Texas. PARTICIPANTS: Public health nurse and social work case managers, who were already employed by health care agencies, delivered the MI interventions. MEASURES: Pre- and postintervention assessments and feedback from trainers and investigators at all three sites. RESULTS: Providers were enthusiastic about the training workshops, which they rated as effective in preparing them to deliver the intervention. Barriers to implementation included difficulty in contacting patients and competing demands on providers' time. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting initial training for providers is the first step in developing skills to deliver motivational interventions. Additional time and resources are needed for ongoing skill building and monitoring of intervention delivery.
Authors: P Dolan-Mullen; C C DiClemente; M M Velasquez; S C Timpson; J Y Groff; J P Carbonari; L Nicol Journal: Tob Control Date: 2000 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Joseph Guydish; Barbara Tajima; Mable Chan; Kevin L Delucchi; Doug Ziedonis Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kathryn I Pollak; Laura J Fish; Pauline Lyna; Bercedis L Peterson; Evan R Myers; Xiaomei Gao; Geeta K Swamy; Angela Brown-Johnson; Paul Whitecar; Alicia K Bilheimer; Pamela K Pletsch Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Kathryn L Taylor; Danielle E Deros; Shelby Fallon; Jennifer Stephens; Emily Kim; Tania Lobo; Kimberly M Davis; George Luta; Jinani Jayasekera; Rafael Meza; Cassandra A Stanton; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Brady McKee; Judith Howell; Michael Ramsaier; Juan Batlle; Ellen Dornelas; Vicky Parikh; Eric Anderson Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Tonya Miller-Thomas; Jeannie-Marie S Leoutsakos; Mishka Terplan; Emily P Brigham; Margaret S Chisolm Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.702