Literature DB >> 10982575

Smoke intake among smokers is higher in lower socioeconomic groups.

M Bobak1, M J Jarvis, Z Skodova, M Marmot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse socioeconomic differences in serum thiocyanate concentrations among current smokers, and whether such differences persist after adjustment for the number of cigarettes smoked.
SETTING: General population of six districts of the Czech Republic in 1992. PARTICIPANTS: 451 male and 282 female current smokers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Serum concentration of thiocyanate.
RESULTS: There was a clear educational gradient in serum thiocyanate among male smokers; car ownership and crowding were not related to thiocyanate. Age adjusted mean concentrations in men with primary, vocational, secondary, and university education were 168.6, 158.2, 148.2, and 141.8 micromol/l, respectively (p for trend 0.032). Adjustment for the average daily number of cigarettes explained a part of this gradient. Socioeconomic differences in serum thiocyanate were not seen in women.
CONCLUSION: The strong gradient in men suggests that smokers from lower socioeconomic groups have a preference for higher smoke intake and so may be more nicotine dependent. This finding, if confirmed, would have important implications for anti-smoking programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10982575      PMCID: PMC1748362          DOI: 10.1136/tc.9.3.310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  5 in total

1.  Automated method for determining serum thiocyanate, to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers.

Authors:  W C Butts; M Kueheman; G M Widdowson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Black-white differences in serum cotinine levels among pregnant women and subsequent effects on infant birthweight.

Authors:  P B English; B Eskenazi; R E Christianson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Nicotine metabolism and intake in black and white smokers.

Authors:  E J Pérez-Stable; B Herrera; P Jacob; N L Benowitz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Racial and ethnic differences in serum cotinine levels of cigarette smokers: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1991.

Authors:  R S Caraballo; G A Giovino; T F Pechacek; P D Mowery; P A Richter; W J Strauss; D J Sharp; M P Eriksen; J L Pirkle; K R Maurer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular risk factors in the Czech Republic.

Authors:  M Bobak; C Hertzman; Z Skodova; M Marmot
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.196

  5 in total
  15 in total

1.  Socioeconomic variations in nicotine dependence, self-efficacy, and intention to quit across four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Authors:  M Siahpush; A McNeill; R Borland; G T Fong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Momentary smoking context as a mediator of the relationship between SES and smoking.

Authors:  Tina Jahnel; Stuart G Ferguson; Saul Shiffman; Johannes Thrul; Benjamin Schüz
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Use of nicotine replacement therapy in socioeconomically deprived young smokers: a community-based pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Elin Roddy; Nick Romilly; Alison Challenger; Sarah Lewis; John Britton
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Socioeconomic status and tobacco expenditure among Australian households: results from the 1998-99 Household Expenditure Survey.

Authors:  M Siahpush
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Comparing in person and internet methods to recruit low-SES populations for tobacco control policy research.

Authors:  Amelia Greiner Safi; Carolyn Reyes; Emma Jesch; Joseph Steinhardt; Jeff Niederdeppe; Christofer Skurka; Motasem Kalaji; Leah Scolere; Sahara Byrne
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Comparison of Puff Volume With Cigarettes per Day in Predicting Nicotine Uptake Among Daily Smokers.

Authors:  Nicolle M Krebs; Allshine Chen; Junjia Zhu; Dongxiao Sun; Jason Liao; Andrea L Stennett; Joshua E Muscat
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Is income or employment a stronger predictor of smoking than education in economically less developed countries? A cross-sectional study in Hungary.

Authors:  Mall Leinsalu; Csilla Kaposvári; Anton E Kunst
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-02-13       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Is the "Glasgow effect" of cigarette smoking explained by socio-economic status?: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Linsay Gray; Alastair H Leyland
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Factors associated with indoor smoking at home by adults across Korea: a focus on socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Bomgyeol Kim; Yejin Lee; Young Dae Kwon; Tae Hyun Kim; Jin Won Noh
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2020-10-28

10.  Critical realism: a practical ontology to explain the complexities of smoking and tobacco control in different resource settings.

Authors:  Dunsi Oladele; Alexander M Clark; Solina Richter; Lory Laing
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.