CONTEXT: Conventional dietary approaches for the treatment of obesity have generally yielded disappointing results. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a low-glycemic index (GI) diet compared with a standard reduced-fat diet in the management of pediatric obesity. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of children attending an outpatient pediatric obesity program from September 1997 to December 1998. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seven obese but otherwise healthy children. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in body mass index (BMI [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters]) and body weight from first to last clinic visit. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients received the low glycemic index diet and 43 received the reduced-fat diet for 4.3 vs 4.2 months' mean duration of follow-up, with 3.3 vs 3.3 mean number of visits, respectively. Body mass index (-1.53 kg/m(2) [95% confidence interval, -1.94 to -1.12] vs -0.06 kg/m(2) [-0.56 to + 0. 44], P<.001) and body weight (-2.03 kg [95% confidence interval -3. 19 to -0.88] vs +1.31 kg [ -0.11 to + 2.72], P<.001) decreased more in the low-GI group compared with the reduced-fat group. In multivariate models, these differences remained significant (P<.01) after adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, BMI or baseline weight, participation in behavioral modification sessions, and treatment duration. Significantly more patients in the low-GI group experienced a decrease in BMI of at least 3 kg/m(2) (11 kg/m(2) [17. 2%] vs. 1 kg/m(2) [2.3%], P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: A low-GI diet seems to be a promising alternative to standard dietary treatment for obesity in children. Long-term randomized controlled trials of a low-GI diet in the prevention and treatment of obesity are needed.
CONTEXT: Conventional dietary approaches for the treatment of obesity have generally yielded disappointing results. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a low-glycemic index (GI) diet compared with a standard reduced-fat diet in the management of pediatric obesity. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of children attending an outpatientpediatric obesity program from September 1997 to December 1998. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seven obese but otherwise healthy children. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in body mass index (BMI [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters]) and body weight from first to last clinic visit. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients received the low glycemic index diet and 43 received the reduced-fat diet for 4.3 vs 4.2 months' mean duration of follow-up, with 3.3 vs 3.3 mean number of visits, respectively. Body mass index (-1.53 kg/m(2) [95% confidence interval, -1.94 to -1.12] vs -0.06 kg/m(2) [-0.56 to + 0. 44], P<.001) and body weight (-2.03 kg [95% confidence interval -3. 19 to -0.88] vs +1.31 kg [ -0.11 to + 2.72], P<.001) decreased more in the low-GI group compared with the reduced-fat group. In multivariate models, these differences remained significant (P<.01) after adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, BMI or baseline weight, participation in behavioral modification sessions, and treatment duration. Significantly more patients in the low-GI group experienced a decrease in BMI of at least 3 kg/m(2) (11 kg/m(2) [17. 2%] vs. 1 kg/m(2) [2.3%], P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: A low-GI diet seems to be a promising alternative to standard dietary treatment for obesity in children. Long-term randomized controlled trials of a low-GI diet in the prevention and treatment of obesity are needed.
Authors: Kelly B Scribner; Dorota B Pawlak; Cristin M Aubin; Joseph A Majzoub; David S Ludwig Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-09-09 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Jaimie N Davis; Emily E Ventura; Gabriel Q Shaibi; Marc J Weigensberg; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Richard M Watanabe; Michael I Goran Journal: Metab Syndr Relat Disord Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 1.894
Authors: Nazrat M Mirza; Matilde G Palmer; Kelly B Sinclair; Robert McCarter; Jianping He; Cara B Ebbeling; David S Ludwig; Jack A Yanovski Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Fernanda Ro Penaforte; Camila C Japur; Letícia P Pigatto; Paula G Chiarello; Rosa W Diez-Garcia Journal: Nutr Res Pract Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 1.926