Literature DB >> 10980221

Efficacy and safety of the novel ultrasound contrast agent perflutren (definity) in patients with suboptimal baseline left ventricular echocardiographic images.

D W Kitzman1, M E Goldman, L D Gillam, J L Cohen, G P Aurigemma, J S Gottdiener.   

Abstract

Suboptimal left ventricular (LV) cavity visualization and endocardial border delineation often compromise the clinical utility of echocardiography. This study examines the safety and efficacy of perflutren, a novel ultrasound contrast agent, for LV cavity opacification and endocardial border delineation in patients with suboptimal baseline echocardiograms. In a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, 211 patients with suspected cardiac disease and suboptimal baseline echocardiograms were enrolled at 17 sites. Two intravenous injections of either placebo (saline) or perflutren (5 or 10 microl/kg) were given approximately 30 minutes apart. Images of the apical 4- and 2-chamber views were acquired and scored. Perflutren opacified the LV cavity after both dosages (5 and 10 microl/kg dosages). Clinically useful contrast was observed in 89% of patients who received perflutren and in 0% of patients who received placebo (p < 0.01). Quantitative assessment of LV opacification with videodensitometry showed similar results. The mean duration of clinically useful contrast was 90 seconds. Improvement in endocardial border delineation was demonstrated in 91% of patients who received perflutren and in 12% of those who received placebo (p < 0.001). Following perflutren, an average of 4 more segments per patient were evaluable compared with baseline. Salvage of nondiagnostic baseline examinations by perflutren was demonstrated in 48% of eligible subjects. The safety profile of perflutren was similar to placebo. These data indicate that administration of perflutren to patients with suboptimal baseline images is well tolerated and provides substantial LV cavity opacification and improvement in endocardial border delineation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10980221     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01050-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  34 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnosis for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the liver.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Sugimoto; Junji Shiraishi; Fuminori Moriyasu; Kunio Doi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-28

2.  Impact of Contrast Echocardiography on Assessment of Ventricular Function and Clinical Diagnosis in Routine Clinical Echocardiography: Korean Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Doo-Youp Kim; Jung-Hyun Choi; Geu-Ru Hong; Se-Joong Rim; Jang-Young Kim; Sang-Chol Lee; Il-Suk Sohn; Wook-Jin Chung; Hye-Sun Seo; Se-Jung Yoon; Kyoung-Im Cho; Si-Wan Choi; Kyung-Jin Lee
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-03-27

3.  Clinical application and laboratory protocols for performing contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  Adrian Chong; Brian Haluska; Sudhir Wahi
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-04-06

Review 4.  Stress echocardiography for the detection and assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Safety of ultrasound contrast agents in the pediatric oncologic population: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jamie L Coleman; Fariba Navid; Wayne L Furman; M Beth McCarville
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Morbid obesity: obscuring the diagnosis of aortic stenosis in a patient with cardiogenic wheezing.

Authors:  Eric D Morrell; William E Katz; Asher A Tulsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Contrast-enhanced sonography of malignant pediatric abdominal and pelvic solid tumors: preliminary safety and feasibility data.

Authors:  M Beth McCarville; Sue C Kaste; Fredric A Hoffer; Raja B Khan; R Christopher Walton; Bruce S Alpert; Wayne L Furman; Chenghong Li; Xiaoping Xiong
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-01-17

Review 8.  Liquid perfluorocarbons as contrast agents for ultrasonography and (19)F-MRI.

Authors:  Raquel Díaz-López; Nicolas Tsapis; Elias Fattal
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Stress echocardiography with contrast for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-06-01

10.  Use of contrast agents with echocardiography in patients with suboptimal echocardiography: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.