Literature DB >> 10978050

Reproducibility of computer-quantified carotid plaque echogenicity: can we overcome the subjectivity?

M M Sabetai1, T J Tegos, A N Nicolaides, S Dhanjil, G J Pare, J M Stevens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: We sought to assess the reproducibility, interobserver variability, and application to clinical studies of a new method for the quantitative assessment of carotid plaque echogenicity.
METHODS: Carotid plaques were scanned with the use of ultrasound, and their images were stored in a computer. They were normalized by assigning certain gray values to blood and adventitia, and the gray scale median (GSM) was used to quantify their echogenicity. The variability between storage media, between degrees of magnification, and between probes was assessed. The method was applied to 232 asymptomatic carotid plaques causing 60% to 99% stenosis in relation to the presence of ipsilateral CT-demonstrated brain infarcts. In all parts of the study the plaque GSM was measured before and after normalization to evaluate its effect. Interobserver agreement for the scanning process was assessed.
RESULTS: The GSM mean difference before and after normalization for variability studies of storage media, degrees of magnification, and probes was -14.5 and -0.12, 2.24 and 1.68, and -8.3 and -0.7, respectively. The median GSM of plaques associated with ipsilateral nonlacunar silent CT-demonstrated brain infarcts was 14, and that of plaques that were not so associated was 30 (P:=0.003). The interobserver GSM difference was -0.05 (95% CI, -1.7 to 1.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Our method decreases the variability between storage media and between probes but not the variability between degrees of magnification. It separates echomorphologically the carotid plaques associated with silent nonlacunar CT-demonstrated brain infarcts from plaques that are not so associated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10978050     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.31.9.2189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  37 in total

1.  Computerized Assessment of Carotid Plaque Echogenicity before Stenting.

Authors:  H Takahata; K Hayashi; N Kitagawa; M Kaminogo; H Koga; S Shibata
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Quantitative assessment of changes in carotid plaques during cilostazol administration using three-dimensional ultrasonography and non-gated magnetic resonance plaque imaging.

Authors:  Mao Yamaguchi; Makoto Sasaki; Hideki Ohba; Kiyofumi Mori; Shinsuke Narumi; Noriyuki Katsura; Kazumasa Ohura; Kohsuke Kudo; Yasuo Terayama
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  Does preoperative carotid stenosis screening reduce perioperative stroke in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?

Authors:  Khalil Masabni; Sajjad Raza; Eugene H Blackstone; Heather L Gornik; Joseph F Sabik
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Prediction of carotid plaque characteristics using non-gated MR imaging: correlation with endarterectomy specimens.

Authors:  S Narumi; M Sasaki; H Ohba; K Ogasawara; M Kobayashi; J Hitomi; K Mori; K Ohura; M Yamaguchi; K Kudo; Y Terayama
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  The development and potential of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging for carotid artery plaque characterization.

Authors:  Jason D Allen; Katherine L Ham; Douglas M Dumont; Bantayehu Sileshi; Gregg E Trahey; Jeremy J Dahl
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.239

6.  Simultaneous assessment of plaque morphology, cerebral micro-embolic signal status and platelet biomarkers in patients with recently symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Stephen J Murphy; Soon T Lim; Justin A Kinsella; Sean Tierney; Bridget Egan; Tim M Feeley; Clare Dooley; James Kelly; Sinead M Murphy; Richard A Walsh; Ronan Collins; Tara Coughlan; Desmond O'Neill; Joseph A Harbison; Prakash Madhavan; Sean M O'Neill; Mary P Colgan; Jim F Meaney; George Hamilton; Dominick Jh McCabe
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  An Ultrasonographic Multiparametric Carotid Plaque Risk Index Associated with Cerebrovascular Symptomatology: A Study Comparing Color Doppler Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography.

Authors:  V Rafailidis; I Chryssogonidis; C Xerras; E Grisan; G-A Cheimariotis; T Tegos; D Rafailidis; P S Sidhu; A Charitanti-Kouridou
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  MR plaque imaging of the carotid artery.

Authors:  Yuji Watanabe; Masako Nagayama
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) on an IVUS circular array.

Authors:  Vivek Patel; Jeremy J Dahl; David P Bradway; Joshua R Doherty; Seung Yun Lee; Stephen W Smith
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for noninvasive characterization of carotid artery atherosclerotic plaques: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Jeremy J Dahl; Douglas M Dumont; Jason D Allen; Elizabeth M Miller; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.