Literature DB >> 10977260

The power of a frame: an analysis of newspaper coverage of tobacco issues--United States, 1985-1996.

C L Menashe1, M Siegel.   

Abstract

For more than three decades, public policy makers and public health officials have had conclusive evidence of the hazards of tobacco use, yet tobacco products remain legal, accessible, and acceptable in our society. Public health advocates have been unable to develop a consistent, coordinated message powerful enough to combat the influence of the tobacco industry. Studying the way in which the tobacco issue has been framed in the mass media over the past decade may provide important clues as to why public health efforts to overcome the tobacco industry's influence on public policy and on tobacco use have not been entirely successful. This paper describes and analyzes the predominant framing tactics used by the tobacco industry and by tobacco control advocates for the last 11 years by reviewing 179 front-page articles from the New York Times and the Washington Post during this period. We conclude that while the tobacco industry has created a central message and theme which has been used constructively and consistently over time, the tobacco control movement has not developed a consistent, powerful, and compelling message. Developing such a message may be important if the nation is to restore progress in reducing tobacco use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10977260     DOI: 10.1080/108107398127139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  53 in total

1.  The tobacco settlement: an analysis of newspaper coverage of a national policy debate, 1997-98.

Authors:  J C Lima; M Siegel
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  The cigar revival and the popular press: a content analysis, 1987-1997.

Authors:  L Wenger; R Malone; L Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Print media coverage of California's smokefree bar law.

Authors:  S Magzamen; A Charlesworth; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Political ideology and tobacco control.

Authors:  J E Cohen; N Milio; R G Rozier; R Ferrence; M J Ashley; A O Goldstein
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Press coverage of public expenditure of Master Settlement Agreement funds: how are non-tobacco control related expenditures represented?

Authors:  K M Clegg Smith; M A Wakefield; M Nichter
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Media attention and public perceptions of cancer and eastern equine encephalitis.

Authors:  Leland K Ackerson; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-08

7.  "We're Part of the Solution": Evolution of the Food and Beverage Industry's Framing of Obesity Concerns Between 2000 and 2012.

Authors:  Laura Nixon; Pamela Mejia; Andrew Cheyne; Cara Wilking; Lori Dorfman; Richard Daynard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Perceived Harm of Secondhand Electronic Cigarette Vapors and Policy Support to Restrict Public Vaping: Results From a National Survey of US Adults.

Authors:  Susan Mello; Cabral A Bigman; Ashley Sanders-Jackson; Andy S L Tan
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Framing pub smoking bans: an analysis of Australian print news media coverage, March 1996-March 2003.

Authors:  David Champion; Simon Chapman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Pictures worth a thousand words: noncommercial tobacco content in the lesbian, gay, and bisexual press.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Smith; Naphtali Offen; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006 Oct-Nov
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.