Literature DB >> 10976693

A binary architectural grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma has superior reproducibility compared with FIGO grading and identifies subsets of advance-stage tumors with favorable and unfavorable prognosis.

S F Lax1, R J Kurman, E S Pizer, L Wu, B M Ronnett.   

Abstract

The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading of uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma requires evaluation of histologic features that can be difficult to assess, including recognition of small amounts of solid growth, distinction of squamous from nonsquamous solid growth, and assessment of degree of nuclear atypia. The authors describe a novel, binary architectural grading system that uses low-magnification assessment of amount of solid growth, pattern of invasion, and presence of necrosis to divide endometrioid carcinomas into low- and high-grade tumors. The authors analyzed its performance for predicting prognosis and with respect to intra- and interobserver reproducibility. A total of 141 endometrioid carcinomas from hysterectomy specimens were graded according to the FIGO system, nuclear grading, and the binary architectural system. A tumor was classified as high grade if at least two of the following three criteria were present: (1) more than 50% solid growth (without distinction of squamous from nonsquamous epithelium); (2) a diffusely infiltrative, rather than expansive, growth pattern; and (3) tumor cell necrosis. For tumors that were confined to the endometrium, only percent solid growth and necrosis were evaluated, and those with both solid growth of more than 50% and necrosis were considered high grade. All tumors were graded independently by three pathologists on two separate occasions. Both inter- and intraobserver agreement using the binary grading system (kappa = 0.65 and 0.79) were superior compared with FIGO (kappa = 0.55 and 0.67) and nuclear grading (kappa = 0.22 and 0.41). The binary grading system stratified patients into three distinct prognostic groups. Patients with stage I low-grade tumors with invasion confined to the inner half of the myometrium (stages IA and IB) had a 100% 5-year survival rate. Patients with low-grade tumors that invaded beyond the outer half of the myometrium (stage IC and stages II-IV) and those with high-grade tumors with invasion confined to the myometrium (stages IB and IC) had a 5-year survival rate of 67% to 76%. In striking contrast to patients with advance-stage low-grade tumors, patients with advance-stage high-grade tumors had a 26% 5-year survival rate. This binary grading system has advantages over FIGO and nuclear grading that permit greater interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility and should be tested in other studies of endometrial endometrioid carcinomas to validate its reproducibility and use for segregating patients into different prognostic groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10976693     DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200009000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  13 in total

1.  HIF-1α and GLUT-1 Expression in Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia, Type I and II Endometrial Carcinoma: A Potential Role in Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Dalia Rifaat Al-Sharaky; Asmaa Gaber Abdou; Moshira Mohammed Abdel Wahed; Hend Abdou Kassem
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

2.  Prognostic significance of solid growth in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Serra Akar; Zeliha Esin Çelik; Sıddıka Fındık; Tolgay Tuyan İlhan; Fedi Ercan; Çetin Çelik
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Data set for reporting of ovary, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinoma: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR).

Authors:  W Glenn McCluggage; Meagan J Judge; Blaise A Clarke; Ben Davidson; C Blake Gilks; Harry Hollema; Jonathan A Ledermann; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Yoshiki Mikami; Colin J R Stewart; Russell Vang; Lynn Hirschowitz
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Controversies in surgical staging of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  R Seracchioli; S Solfrini; M Mabrouk; C Facchini; N Di Donato; L Manuzzi; L Savelli; S Venturoli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-23

5.  Necrosis related HIF-1alpha expression predicts prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura M S Seeber; Nicole Horrée; Petra van der Groep; Elsken van der Wall; René H M Verheijen; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Interobserver Variability in the Diagnosis of Uterine High-Grade Endometrioid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Sumi Thomas; Yaser Hussein; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Michele Cote; Oudai Hassan; Eman Abdulfatah; Baraa Alosh; Hui Guan; Robert A Soslow; Rouba Ali-Fehmi
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  The pattern of myometrial invasion as a predictor of lymph node metastasis or extrauterine disease in low-grade endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Elizabeth Euscher; Patricia Fox; Roland Bassett; Hayma Al-Ghawi; Rouba Ali-Fehmi; Denise Barbuto; Bojana Djordjevic; Elizabeth Frauenhoffer; Insun Kim; Sun Rang Hong; Delia Montiel; Elizabeth Moschiano; Andres Roma; Elvio Silva; Anais Malpica
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 8.  [Grading of gynecological tumors : Current aspects].

Authors:  L-C Horn; D Mayr; C E Brambs; J Einenkel; I Sändig; K Schierle
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

9.  Interobserver agreement for endometrial cancer characteristics evaluated on biopsy material.

Authors:  S Nofech-Mozes; N Ismiil; V Dubé; R S Saad; Z Ghorab; A Grin; I Ackerman; M A Khalifa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2012-02-02

10.  Tumor necrosis is an important hallmark of aggressive endometrial cancer and associates with hypoxia, angiogenesis and inflammation responses.

Authors:  Geir Bredholt; Monica Mannelqvist; Ingunn M Stefansson; Even Birkeland; Trond Hellem Bø; Anne M Øyan; Jone Trovik; Karl-Henning Kalland; Inge Jonassen; Helga B Salvesen; Elisabeth Wik; Lars A Akslen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.