Literature DB >> 10976544

Race and sex influence clearance of nifedipine: results of a population study.

M E Krecic-Shepard1, K Park, C Barnas, J Slimko, D R Kerwin, J B Schwartz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate oral clearance of nifedipine and to determine demographic and clinical covariates that affect nifedipine clearance in a clinical population.
METHODS: Apparent oral clearance of nifedipine and protein binding were measured in 226 patients receiving sustained-release nifedipine formulations for hypertension and coronary artery disease (black men, n = 111; black women, n = 27; white men, n = 64; white women, n = 24). Mean age +/- SD was 71 +/- 11 years, and mean weight was 86 +/- 17 kg. Nifedipine concentrations were analyzed by HPLC, protein binding was measured by equilibrium dialysis, clearance and covariate effects were estimated by a nonlinear mixed effects population model, and statistical analyses were performed by a nonlinear mixed-effects model (clearance) and ANOVA (protein binding).
RESULTS: Clearance was significantly slower in black subjects (8.9 +/- 0.7 mL/min/kg; mean +/- SE) compared with white subjects (11.6 +/- 0.8 mL/min/kg; P = .00004) and in men compared with women (9.3 +/- 0.6 versus 12.1 +/- 1.5 mL/min/kg; P = .0021). Reported alcohol use (alcohol, 8.6 +/- 1.1 versus no alcohol, 10.8 +/- 0.6 mL/min/kg; P = .0002) and smoking status (smoker, 8.8 +/- 2.0 versus nonsmoker, 10.2 +/- 0.6 mL/min/kg; P = .0362) also affected nifedipine clearance. Race and sex had no effect on protein binding of nifedipine (P = .29 and P = .44, respectively). No effects of age, stable coronary artery disease, or reported intake of beta-blockers on nifedipine clearance were detected in this primarily elderly population with hypertension.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that race, sex, and environmental factors are identifiable sources of interindividual variation in the oral clearance of nifedipine, a CYP3A substrate. Our experience also suggests that data from clinical populations may be biased with regard to age, sex, and formulation selection, and covariates may not be independently distributed, which can limit analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10976544     DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2000.108678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  19 in total

Review 1.  Perils and pitfalls of reporting sex differences.

Authors:  Donna L Maney
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Ethnic or racial differences revisited: impact of dosage regimen and dosage form on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Chen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis for risperidone using highly sparse sampling measurements from the CATIE study.

Authors:  Yan Feng; Bruce G Pollock; Kim Coley; Stephen Marder; Del Miller; Margaret Kirshner; Manickam Aravagiri; Lon Schneider; Robert R Bies
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  How important are gender differences in pharmacokinetics?

Authors:  Bernd Meibohm; Ingrid Beierle; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Age-related changes in plasma concentrations of the HIV protease inhibitor lopinavir.

Authors:  Keith W Crawford; John Spritzler; Robert C Kalayjian; Teresa Parsons; Alan Landay; Richard Pollard; Vicki Stocker; Michael M Lederman; Charles Flexner
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.205

Review 6.  HNF4α--role in drug metabolism and potential drug target?

Authors:  Wendy W Hwang-Verslues; Frances M Sladek
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.547

Review 7.  Sex differences in the expression of hepatic drug metabolizing enzymes.

Authors:  David J Waxman; Minita G Holloway
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.436

8.  Androgen receptor is responsible for rat organic cation transporter 2 gene regulation but not for rOCT1 and rOCT3.

Authors:  Jun-ichi Asaka; Tomohiro Terada; Masahiro Okuda; Toshiya Katsura; Ken-ichi Inui
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  The distribution and gender difference of CYP3A activity in Chinese subjects.

Authors:  Bing Zhu; Zhao-Qian Liu; Guo-Lin Chen; Xiao-Ping Chen; Dong-Sheng Ou-Yang; Lian-Sheng Wang; Song-Lin Huang; Zhi-Rong Tan; Hong-Hao Zhou
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Representation of women, older patients, ethnic, and racial minorities in trials of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Muhammad Zia Khan; Muhammad Bilal Munir; Safi U Khan; Charumathi Raghu Subramanian; Muhammad Usman Khan; Zain Ul Abideen Asad; Swapna Talluri; Aarthi Madhanakumar; Ahmad Naeem Lone; Muhammad Shahzeb Khan; Erin D Michos; Mohamad Alkhouli
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 1.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.