Literature DB >> 10975476

The six year experience of plasmapheresis in patients with myasthenia gravis.

H C Chiu1, W H Chen, J H Yeh.   

Abstract

Plasmapheresis (PP) effectively removes autoantibodies in various autoimmune diseases. The use of PP in the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) has been widely accepted since the 1970s. The treatment protocol, however, has not been standardized. For the last 6 years, we collected a total of 94 MG patients, 38 males and 56 females aged 14-80 years, who received 175 courses of PP treatment for a total of 823 sessions. The methods we used were double filtration plasmapheresis (DF), immunoadsorption plasmapheresis (IA), and plasma exchange (PE). There were 167 courses of DF, 6 courses of IA, and 2 courses of PE. Each course of treatment consists of 4 to 5 sessions of apheresis. The processed volume of plasma is 1 calculated plasma volume. All patients tolerated PP well although 2.3% of them experienced hypotension. Our experiences are summarized as follows. Both DF and IA effectively ameliorate symptoms and signs of MG. IA removes acetylcholine receptor antibody more effectively than DF does, but clinical effects between these 2 methods are similar. A daily schedule seems more effective than an alternate daily schedule. The optimal number of PP sessions for each course is 4. The factors correlating with better clinical response are high MG score, nonthymoma patients, younger age at onset, and higher removal rate for immunoglobulin G.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10975476     DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-0968.2000.004004291.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Apher        ISSN: 1091-6660


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Plasma exchange as a therapeutic option in neurological disorders].

Authors:  H C Lehmann; H P Hartung; G R Hetzel; B C Kieseier
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Plasma exchange versus intravenous immunoglobulin for myasthenia gravis crisis: an acute hospital cost comparison study.

Authors:  Chad Heatwole; Nicholas Johnson; Robert Holloway; Katia Noyes
Journal:  J Clin Neuromuscul Dis       Date:  2011-12

Review 3.  Myasthaenia Gravis: Clinical management issues before, during and after pregnancy.

Authors:  Ali Hassan; Zakia M Yasawy
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2017-10-10

4.  In vivo adsorption of autoantibodies in myasthenia gravis using Nanodisc-incorporated acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  Jian Rong Sheng; Steve Grimme; Palash Bhattacharya; Michael H B Stowell; Michael Artinger; Bellur S Prabahakar; Matthew N Meriggioli
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 5.  Update on myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  B R Thanvi; T C N Lo
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Comparative efficacy of low dose, daily versus alternate day plasma exchange in severe myasthenia gravis: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Isha Trikha; Sumit Singh; Vinay Goyal; Garima Shukla; Rama Bhasin; Madhuri Behari
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 7.  Pathophysiological basis in the management of myasthenia gravis: a mini review.

Authors:  Aiswarya Binu; Sarath S Kumar; Uma Devi Padma; Krishnadas Madhu
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.473

8.  Our Clinical Experience in the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis Acute Exacerbations with a Novel Nanomembrane-Based Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Technology.

Authors:  Dimitar Tonev; Radostina Georgieva; Evgeniy Vavrek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 9.  Plasma exchange for myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  P Gajdos; S Chevret; K Toyka
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.