Literature DB >> 10975265

Is there an option for harvesting autologous osteochondral grafts without damaging weight-bearing areas in the knee joint?

J Jerosch1, T Filler, E Peuker.   

Abstract

Within the past few years autologous osteochondral transplantation has become an established standardized procedure in joint surgery. One significant disadvantage of this technique is the harvesting of the osteochondral grafts from the weight-bearing area of the knee joint. The tibiofibular articulation is located close to the knee joint that is operated on. This articulation is covered with cartilage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether this joint is suitable as a donor site for osteochondral grafts. Ten human knee specimens were freed of all soft tissues around the proximal calf. The age of the specimens ranged between 58 and 79 years. Next the tibiofibular articulation was identified, and both the ligaments and the capsule were removed. After opening the joint the tibial- and fibular-sided joint surfaces were inspected and measured. In all specimens the articular surfaces showed good cartilage coverage. In only a single joint did the cartilage macroscopically show degeneration. In all other joints the cartilage surface was in surprisingly good condition, especially considering the age of the specimens. The average diameter of the cartilage surface on the tibial side was 1.7 +/- 0.26 x 1.9 +/- 0.22 cm and on the fibular side 1.6 +/- 0.31 x 1.8 +/- 0.32 cm. This results in an area of cartilage for transplantation of 3.23 cm2 at the tibia and of 2.88 cm2 at the fibula. The total area for cartilage transplantation is 6.11 cm2. The tibiofibular joint contains cartilage, which may be a reasonable donor site even for the elderly patient. Harvesting the graft from this area may avoid iatrogenic damaging of intra-articular weight-bearing cartilage of the knee joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10975265     DOI: 10.1007/s001670000122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  6 in total

1.  Sensate scaffolds can reliably detect joint loading.

Authors:  C L Bliss; J A Szivek; B C Tellis; D S Margolis; A B Schnepp; J T Ruth
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.368

2.  [Osteotomy for approaches to the knee joint. Tibial tubercle, lateral epicondyle of the femur and head of the fibula].

Authors:  O Lorbach; K Anagnostakos; D Kohn
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint in athletes.

Authors:  Rimtautas Gudas; Edgaras Stankevicius; Egle Monastyreckiene; Darius Pranys; Romas J Kalesinskas
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Autologous osteochondral transplantation for the treatment of knee lesions: results and limitations at two years' follow-up.

Authors:  Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Francesco Perdisa; Federica Balboni; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Instructive cartilage regeneration modalities with advanced therapeutic implantations under abnormal conditions.

Authors:  Zhonghan Wang; Hanxiang Le; Yanbing Wang; He Liu; Zuhao Li; Xiaoyu Yang; Chenyu Wang; Jianxun Ding; Xuesi Chen
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-11-18

6.  Mosaicplasty Using Grafts From the Upper Tibiofibular Joint.

Authors:  João Espregueira-Mendes; Renato Andrade; Alberto Monteiro; Hélder Pereira; Manuel Vieira da Silva; J Miguel Oliveira; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-10-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.