Literature DB >> 10974448

Postradiotherapy prostate biopsies: what do they really mean? Results for 498 patients.

J Crook1, S Malone, G Perry, Y Bahadur, S Robertson, M Abdolell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Postradiotherapy (RT) prostate biopsies are prone to problems in interpretation. False negatives due to sampling error, false positives due to delayed tumor regression, and indeterminate biopsies showing radiation effect in residual tumor of uncertain viability are common occurrences. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A cohort of 498 men treated with conventional RT from 06/87-10/96 were followed prospectively with systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided post-RT prostate biopsies, starting 12-18 months after RT. If there was residual tumor but further decline in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsies were repeated every 6-12 months. Patients with negative biopsies were rebiopsied at 36 months. Residual tumor was evaluated for RT effect and proliferation markers. The 498 men had 978 biopsies. Median time of the first biopsy (n = 498) was 13 months, biopsy #2 (n = 342) 28 months, biopsy #3 (n = 110) 36 months, biopsy #4 (n = 28) 44 months, and biopsy #5 (n = 4) 55 months. Median follow-up is 54 months (range 13-131). One hundred seventy-five patients (34%) had prior hormonal therapy for a median of 5 months (range 1-60).
RESULTS: Clinical stage distribution was T1b: 46; T1c: 50; T2a: 115; T2b/c: 170; T3: 108; T4: 11; Tx: 1. Distribution by Gleason score was: 28% Gleason score 2-4; 42%: 5-6; 18%: 7; and 12%: 8-10. Seventy-one men have died, 26 of prostate cancer and 45 of other causes. Actuarial failure-free survival by T stage at 5 years is T1b: 78%; T1c: 76%; T2a: 60%; T2b/c: 55%; T3: 30%; and T4: 0%. Actuarial freedom from local failure at 5 years is T1b: 83%; T1c: 88%; T2a: 72%; T2b/c: 66%; T3: 58%; and T4: 0%. The proportion of indeterminate biopsies decreases with time, being 33% for biopsy 1, 24% for biopsy 2, 18% for biopsy 3, and 7% for biopsy 4. Thirty percent of indeterminate biopsies resolved to NED status, regardless of the degree of RT effect, 18% progressed to local failure, and 34% remained as biopsy failures with indeterminate status within the time frame of this report. Positive staining for proliferation markers was associated with both subsequent local failure and also any type of failure. In multivariate analysis, only PSA nadir (p = 0.0002) and biopsy status at 24-36 months (p = 0. 0005) were independent predictors of outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Post-RT prostate biopsies are not a gold standard of treatment efficacy, but are an independent predictor of outcome. Positive immunohistochemical staining for markers of cellular proliferation is associated with subsequent local failure. Indeterminate biopsies, even when showing marked RT effect, cannot be considered negative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10974448     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00637-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  47 in total

Review 1.  Radiation therapy dose escalation for prostate cancer: a rationale for IMRT.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Alex Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Steven Feigenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Robert A Price
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Salvage robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Jim C Hu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Detection of recurrent prostate carcinoma with anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid PET/CT and 111In-capromab pendetide SPECT/CT.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Bital Savir-Baruch; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Raghuveer K Halkar; Peter J Rossi; Melinda M Lewis; Jonathon A Nye; Weiping Yu; F DuBois Bowman; Mark M Goodman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Multiparametric 3T endorectal mri after external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; Galen D Reed; Phillip P Vinh; Christopher Sotto; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  [Tumour recurrence].

Authors:  O W Hakenberg; F Sedlmayer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Long-Term Implications of a Positive Posttreatment Biopsy in Patients Treated with External Beam Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Debra A Goldman; Victor Reuter; Marisa Kollmeier; Sean McBride; Zhigang Zhang; Melissa Varghese; Xin Pei; Zvi Fuks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Assessment of histopathological features of needle biopsy in recurrent prostate cancer following salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Michele Billia; Khurram M Siddiqui; Susanne Chan; Fan Li; Ali Al-Zahrani; Jose A Gomez; Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Radiation dose and late failures in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter B Morgan; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski; Robert G Uzzo; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  PET with (18)F-labelled choline-based tracers for tumour imaging: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Koen Mertens; Dominique Slaets; Bieke Lambert; Marjan Acou; Filip De Vos; Ingeborg Goethals
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Residual prostate cancer after radiotherapy: a study of radical cystoprostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  David J Kaplan; Paul L Crispen; Richard E Greenberg; David Y T Chen; Rosalia Viterbo; Mark K Buyyounouski; Eric M Horwitz; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.