Literature DB >> 10974380

Continuing reluctance to use single fractions of radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain: an Australian and New Zealand practice survey and literature review.

D E Roos1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To survey Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) radiation oncologists on their preferred fractionation regimens for pain due to bone metastases in the context of similar overseas surveys and the large body of evidence from randomized trials.
METHODS: Delegates to the October 1998 Royal ANZ College of Radiologists Annual Scientific Meeting were asked to state their fractionation for four hypothetical cases viz. local bone pain from metastatic breast, prostate and lung cancer and neuropathic (radicular) pain from metastatic lung cancer. In addition to demographic data, respondents were asked to select reasons for their choices and indicate what factors would influence a change in their recommended fractionation.
RESULTS: Twelve of 32 trainees and 41 of 82 specialists completed the survey, giving an overall response rate of 46%. There was decreasing use of shorter fractionation schedules from lung through prostate to breast cancer with, in particular, single fractions recommended by, respectively, 42, 28 and 15% of respondents for local bone pain (P=0.013). However, the presence of neuropathic pain from metastatic lung cancer led to lower use of single fractions (15%, P=0.0046). There were no statistically significant differences in preferred fractionation with respect to other variables assessed in this survey. The commonest reasons cited for fractionating were desire to minimize recurrent pain and the influence of training, with desire to minimize the risk of neurological progression and optimize tumour regression also important for neuropathic pain. By contrast, use of single fractions was most commonly based upon literature results and patient convenience. Changing from multiple to single fractions was most influenced by poor performance status, while the presence of neurological signs/symptoms had the reverse effect.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this ANZ survey largely reflect the results from other surveys performed in the UK, Europe, Canada and USA. Although debate continues in the literature, the continuing preference of radiation oncologists to fractionate for local bone pain is contrary to the 16 randomized trials published to date which give little support for a dose-response relationship above a single 6-8 Gy in this setting. This practice has significant implications for departmental workload, costs to the healthcare system and patient convenience. There is no objective evidence on the influence of fractionation for neuropathic bone pain in the literature at present, although an ANZ randomized trial addressing this problem is under way (TROG 96.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10974380     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00250-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  15 in total

1.  Patients who die during palliative radiotherapy. Status survey.

Authors:  B Berger; H Ankele; M Bamberg; D Zips
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases from lung cancer: Evidence-based medicine?

Authors:  Alysa Fairchild
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

3.  A survey of patterns of practice on palliative radiation therapy for bone metastasis in Korea.

Authors:  Yoonsun Chung; Woong Sub Koom; Yong Chan Ahn; Hee-Chul Park; Hak Jae Kim; Sang Min Yoon; Sangjin Shin; Yoon Jae Lee
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Use of low-value radiotherapy practices in Canada: an analysis of provincial cancer registry data.

Authors:  K Tran; R Rahal; M Brundage; S Fung; C Louzado; M Milosevic; J Xu; H Bryant
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  European French-speaking study from the GEMO group on bone metastases management: a special focus on external beam radiotherapy practice survey.

Authors:  Nicolas Magné; Cyrus Chargari; René Olivier Mirimanoff; Pierre Olivier; Jean Philippe Vuillez; Michèle Tubiana-Hulin; Jean Jacques Body; Jean Léon Lagrange
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Review of patterns of practice and patients' preferences in the treatment of bone metastases with palliative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicole M E Bradley; Janice Husted; Michael Sai Lai Sey; Amna F Husain; Emily Sinclair; Kristin Harris; Edward Chow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 3.359

7.  Use of palliative radiotherapy in brain and bone metastases (VARA II study).

Authors:  Jose Expósito; Javier Jaén; Enrique Alonso; Isabel Tovar
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Single Fraction versus Multiple Fraction Radiotherapy for Palliation of Painful Vertebral Bone Metastases: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Dipanjan Majumder; Debashis Chatterjee; Anis Bandyopadhyay; Swapan Kumar Mallick; Shyamal Kumar Sarkar; Anjali Majumdar
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2012-09

9.  Radiotherapy fractionation for the palliation of uncomplicated painful bone metastases - an evidence-based practice guideline.

Authors:  Jackson Sai-Yiu Wu; Rebecca K S Wong; Nancy S Lloyd; Mary Johnston; Andrea Bezjak; Timothy Whelan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2004-10-04       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Influence of the treatment schedule on the physicians' decisions to refer bone metastases patients for palliative radiotherapy: a questionnaire survey of physicians in various specialties.

Authors:  Tetsuo Saito; Ryo Toya; Akiko Semba; Tomohiko Matsuyama; Natsuo Oya
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.131

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.