Literature DB >> 10973843

Response to antihypertensive therapy in older patients with sustained and nonsustained systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators.

R H Fagard1, J A Staessen, L Thijs, J Gasowski, C J Bulpitt, D Clement, P W de Leeuw, J Dobovisek, M Jääskivi, G Leonetti, E O'Brien, P Palatini, G Parati, J L Rodicio, H Vanhanen, J Webster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of the present study was to assess the effect of antihypertensive therapy on clinic (CBP) and ambulatory (ABP) blood pressures, on ECG voltages, and on the incidence of stroke and cardiovascular events in older patients with sustained and nonsustained systolic hypertension. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients who were >/=60 years old, with systolic CBP of 160 to 219 mm Hg and diastolic CBP of <95 mm Hg, were randomized into the double-blind placebo-controlled Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial. Treatment consisted of nitrendipine, with the possible addition of enalapril, hydrochlorothiazide, or both. Patients enrolled in the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Side Project were classified according to daytime systolic ABP into 1 of 3 subgroups: nonsustained hypertension (<140 mm Hg), mild sustained hypertension (140 to 159 mm Hg), and moderate sustained hypertension (>/=160 mm Hg). At baseline, patients with nonsustained hypertension had smaller ECG voltages (P<0.001) and, during follow-up, a lower incidence of stroke (P<0.05) and of cardiovascular complications (P=0.01) than other groups. Active treatment reduced ABP and CBP in patients with sustained hypertension but only CBP in patients with nonsustained hypertension (P<0.001). The influence of active treatment on ECG voltages (P<0.05) and on the incidence of stroke (P<0.05) and cardiovascular events (P=0.06) was more favorable than that of placebo only in patients with moderate sustained hypertension.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with sustained hypertension had higher ECG voltages and rates of cardiovascular complications than did patients with nonsustained hypertension. The favorable effects of active treatment on these outcomes were only statistically significant in patients with moderate sustained hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10973843     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.10.1139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  49 in total

Review 1.  Using out of office blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  P Verdecchia
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Eoin O'Brien
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Genome-wide association studies of hypertension: have they been fruitful?

Authors:  Sajjad Rafiq; Sonia Anand; Robert Roberts
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Prevalence and determinants of white coat effect in a large UK hypertension clinic population.

Authors:  O Thomas; K E Shipman; K Day; M Thomas; U Martin; I Dasgupta
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Clinical trials report. White-coat hypertension and stroke incidence.

Authors:  Domenic A Sica
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.369

6.  Changes in home versus clinic blood pressure with antihypertensive treatments: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joji Ishikawa; Deirdre J Carroll; Sujith Kuruvilla; Joseph E Schwartz; Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 7.  Going Beyond the Guidelines in Individualising the Use of Antihypertensive Drugs in Older Patients.

Authors:  Ian A Scott; Sarah N Hilmer; David G Le Couteur
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Cognitive and autonomic dysfunction measures in normal controls, white coat and borderline hypertension.

Authors:  Abdullah Shehab; Abdishakur Abdulle
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  The use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring among Medicare beneficiaries in 2007-2010.

Authors:  Daichi Shimbo; Shia T Kent; Keith M Diaz; Lei Huang; Anthony J Viera; Meredith Kilgore; Suzanne Oparil; Paul Muntner
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2014-09-18

Review 10.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the prediction and prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Kang; Yan Li; Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.