Literature DB >> 10973649

Evaluation of basal estradiol levels in assisted reproductive technology cycles.

J L Frattarelli1, P A Bergh, M R Drews, F I Sharara, R T Scott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if basal E(2) screening increases the diagnostic accuracy of basal FSH screening and to determine whether basal E(2) levels correlate with outcome in ART cycles.
DESIGN: Retrospective.
SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENT(S): Two thousand six hundred thirty-four infertility patients. INTERVENTION(S): Cycle outcome was evaluated after grouping patients by basal E(2) levels beginning at <20 pg/mL and extending to >100 pg/mL at 10 pg/mL increments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Retrieved oocytes, pregnancy rate, and cancellation rate. RESULT(S): Cancellation rates were significantly increased in patients with basal E(2) levels of <20 pg/mL or >/=80 pg/mL. Basal E(2) levels neither predicted pregnancy outcome nor correlated with ovarian response in those patients not canceled. CONCLUSION(S): Patients with basal E(2) levels of <20 pg/mL or >/=80 pg/mL had an increased risk for cancellation. Basal E(2) was predictive of stimulation parameters in patients 40 years or older. For those patients who proceeded to retrieval, there were no differences in pregnancy or delivery rates relative to basal E(2) levels. This suggests that irrespective of basal E(2) levels patients who produce more than three maturing follicles in response to stimulation have adequate ovarian reserve as evidenced by their pregnancy rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10973649     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00693-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian reserve evaluation: state of the art.

Authors:  Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho; Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa e Silva; Júlio César Rosa e Silva; Rosana Maria dos Reis; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Marcos Felipe Silva de Sá
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The clinical analysis of poor ovarian response in in-vitro-fertilization embryo-transfer among Chinese couples.

Authors:  X M Zhen; J Qiao; R Li; L N Wang; P Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  A new approach to ovarian reserve testing.

Authors:  Wenjie Sun; Barbara J Stegmann; Melinda Henne; William H Catherino; James H Segars
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Dynamic measurements of serum inhibin B and estradiol: a predictive evaluation of ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation in the early stage of IVF treatment.

Authors:  Ming-fang Miao; He-feng Huang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Ovarian reserve tests.

Authors:  Padma Rekah Jirge
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-09

6.  Ovarian reserve assessment for infertility investigation.

Authors:  Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho; David Barreira Gomes Sobrinho; Andréa Duarte Damasceno Vieira; Manoela Porto Silva Resende; Antônio César Paes Barbosa; Adelino Amaral Silva; Hitomi Miura Nakagava
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-01-26

7.  Age as A Predictor of Embryo Quality Regardless of The Quantitative Ovarian Response.

Authors:  Juliano Brum Scheffer; Bruno Brum Scheffer; Rafaela Friche de Carvalho; Joyce Rodrigues; Michael Grynberg; Daniel H Mendez Lozano
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-11-11

8.  Are age and anti-Müllerian hormone good predictors of ovarian reserve and response in women undergoing IVF?

Authors:  Juliano Augusto Brum Scheffer; Bruno Scheffer; Rafaela Scheffer; Fabio Florencio; Michael Grynberg; Daniel Mendez Lozano
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2018-09-01

9.  Impact of GnRH ovarian stimulation protocols on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes.

Authors:  Fátima Pinto; Cristiano Oliveira; Margarida F Cardoso; José Teixeira-da-Silva; Joaquina Silva; Mário Sousa; Alberto Barros
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Predictor for supraphysiologic serum estradiol elevation on hCG triggering day of controlled ovarian stimulation using letrozole and gonadotropins in women with estrogen-dependent cancers.

Authors:  Sung Woo Kim; Soo Jin Han; Ji Yeon Han; Hoon Kim; Seung-Yup Ku; Chang Suk Suh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.