Literature DB >> 10973536

Partial upper re-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement or re-replacement after previous cardiac surgery.

J G Byrne1, A N Karavas, D H Adams, L Aklog, S F Aranki, G S Couper, R J Rizzo, L H Cohn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We developed techniques for 'inverted T' partial upper re-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (AVR) or re-replacement (AVreR) after previous cardiac surgery. We previously reported on decreased blood loss, transfusion requirements and total operative duration when compared to conventional full re-sternotomy. This report updates our series, one of the few to document a substantial benefit from a 'minimally-invasive' approach, refines a number of technical aspects of this new approach and reports follow-up.
METHODS: Between November 1996 and December 1999, we performed 34 AVRs or AVreRs after previous cardiac surgery by use of an 'inverted T' partial upper re-sternotomy. There were 25 (74%) men. Median ejection fraction was 54%, range 15-80%. Median age was 72, range 38-93. All were New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA) functional class II or III. Twenty-one (62%) had previous coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) while 14 (41%) had previous valve surgery. Follow-up was 100% complete for a total of 593 patient months (median 19 months).
RESULTS: Twenty-three (66%) underwent AVR of the native aortic valve while 11 (33%) underwent AVreR of a prosthetic aortic valve. There were no intraoperative or valve-related complications, and no conversion to full re-sternotomy was necessary. There were two (5.9%) operative deaths from an arrhythmia on postoperative day 4 and a large stroke during surgery, respectively. Twenty-four (75%) patients were free of major complications. There was no need for reoperation for bleeding and patients required a median of two units of packed red blood cells. Complications included new atrial fibrillation (n=3, 9%), pacemaker implantation (n=3, 9%) and deep sternal wound infection (n=2, 6%). Median lengths of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the hospital were 1 and 7 days, respectively. There was one (3%) late deep sternal wound infection and 2/32 (6%) late deaths due to congestive heart failure at 22 months and myocardial infarction at 23 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Partial upper re-sternotomy presents a safe and effective alternative approach to AVR and AVreR after previous cardiac surgery, and is associated with low morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10973536     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00528-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  8 in total

Review 1.  Is a minimally invasive approach for re-operative aortic valve replacement superior to standard full resternotomy?

Authors:  Andrés M Pineda; Orlando Santana; Gervasio A Lamas; Joseph Lamelas
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-05-07

Review 2.  Aortic valve replacement through J-shaped partial upper sternotomy.

Authors:  Shahzad G Raja; Umberto Benedetto; Mohamed Amrani
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Reoperative minimal access aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Marzia Leacche; John Byrne; Lawrence Cohn
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Minimal access aortic root, valve, and complex ascending aortic surgery.

Authors:  J G Byrne; A N Karavas; L H Cohn; D H Adams
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Clinical features of third open-heart valve surgery at the same valve position.

Authors:  Shin-ichi Ohki; Yoshio Misawa; Tsutomu Saito; Hiroaki Konishi; Yuichiro Kaminishi; Yasuhito Sakano; Kei Aizawa; Hideki Takahashi; Masanobu Taguchi; Takako Shinohara
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-12

Review 6.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in high risk patient groups.

Authors:  Daniel Fudulu; Harriet Lewis; Umberto Benedetto; Massimo Caputo; Gianni Angelini; Hunaid A Vohra
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Minimally invasive approach to calcified aortic valve replacement: Anaesthetic considerations.

Authors:  Tomas Vymazal
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2015-06

8.  Comparison of limited and full sternotomy in aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Etsuro Suenaga; Hisao Suda; Yuji Katayama; Manabu Sato; Hiroya Fujita; Ko Yoshizumi; Tsuyoshi Itoh
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.