Literature DB >> 1097296

Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Analysis of 300 consecutive cases.

D S Zimmon, D B Falkenstein, C Riccobono, B Aaron.   

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of complications arising from 300 consecutive attempts at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 278 patients was undetaken to determine the rate and severity of complications. An over-all complication rate of 5% (15 cases) was documented. Complications were categorized in terms of those arising from endoscopy itself or from the administration of pharmacological agents (7 cases), and those observed after the injection of radioopaque contrast into the biliary tree or pancreas (8 cases). Complications which might be considered coincidental to a patient's underlying illness were not excluded. Complications were significantly more frequent after injection of diseased duct systems. Brief, self-limited pancreatitis after retrograde pancreatography occurred in 5 of 90 patients with pancreatic disease. No cases of pancreatitis were observed after retrograde pancreatography in 102 patients without pancreatic disease X2 = 5.82, P less than 0.025). Sepsis occurred after retrograde cholangiography in 3 of 56 patients with extrahepatic biliary obstruction. In the absence of extrahepatic obstruction, cholangiography was performed without complication in 85 cases (X2 = 3.62, P less than 0.1), although 25 of these had intense cholestasis due to hepatic parenchymal disease. This analysis provides the basis for modifications of ERCP technique and management that may reduce the future incidence of complications. This study suggests that the incidence and severity of complications that arise from ERCP compare favorably with procedures of equivalent diagnostic yield.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1097296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  24 in total

Review 1.  Biliary concrements: the endoscopic approach.

Authors:  A R Rosseland; M Osnes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S P Povoski; M S Karpeh; K C Conlon; L H Blumgart; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  ERCP.

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa liver abscesses following endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Report of a case without biliary tract disease.

Authors:  T Davion; A Braillon; J Delamarre; R Delcenserie; J P Joly; J P Capron
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in preoperative assessment of bile duct cancer.

Authors:  M Tanaka; Y Ogawa; S Matsumoto; F Nakayama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  ERCP, cholangiography, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) opinion survey.

Authors:  R J Brodish; A S Fink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Gastrointestinal instrumentation, bacteraemia, and endocarditis.

Authors:  P J Shorvon; S J Eykyn; P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Postoperative T-tube cholangiography. Is antibiotic coverage necessary.

Authors:  H A Pitt; R G Postier; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Gastrointestinal endoscopy: infection and disinfection.

Authors:  H J O'Connor; A T Axon
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Multiple pancreatic pseudocyst disease.

Authors:  R J Goulet; J Goodman; R Schaffer; S Dallemand; D K Andersen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.