Literature DB >> 6691732

Multiple pancreatic pseudocyst disease.

R J Goulet, J Goodman, R Schaffer, S Dallemand, D K Andersen.   

Abstract

In an effort to determine the incidence of multiple pseudocyst disease and establish the optimal approach to this problem, the records of 91 consecutive patients diagnosed during a 36-month period as having pancreatic pseudocyst disease by sonography or computerized tomographic scanning were reviewed. Thirteen patients (14.3%) had multiple cysts; all received sonograms and six had CT scans. The combined false negative and false positive rate with sonography was 9%. Spontaneous resolution occurred involving five cysts (18%) up to 6.5 cm in size. The diagnosis of cyst multiplicity was confirmed at operation in seven cases; two of the seven operations were excisional and the remaining patients received drainage procedures. There were no operative deaths; complications included one patient who required chronic enzyme replacement therapy after excision and another patient who developed a subphrenic abscess after attempted percutaneous drainage. The incidence of multiple pseudocyst disease in our series is just over 14%. The possibility of multiplicity should be carefully investigated in each patient with pseudocyst disease. In light of the rate of spontaneous resolution, not all patients with multiple pseudocysts may require operative therapy. Because of the 7.7% false negative diagnoses with sonography, CT scanning is especially helpful when the diagnosis of multiple pseudocysts is suspected or in preoperative preparation of pseudocyst drainage. If an operation becomes necessary, a drainage procedure rather than excision should be used whenever possible to maximize gland salvage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6691732      PMCID: PMC1353250          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198401000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  34 in total

1.  Spontaneous resolution of pancreatic masses (pseudocysts?)--Development and disappearance after acute alcoholic pancreatitis.

Authors:  A J Czaja; M Fisher; G A Marin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1975-04

2.  Pancreatic imaging by ultrasound and computed tomography: a general review.

Authors:  J K Lee; R J Stanley; G L Melson; S S Sagel
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Unusual diagnostic aspects and current management of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  P K Gilman; J C Gibbons; M S Kaplan; G L Juler
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Sonographic diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  J L Stuber; A W Templeton; K Bishop
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1972-10

5.  Pseudocyst of the pancreas. A review of fifty cases.

Authors:  N R Thomford; J E Jesseph
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Computed tomography of the pancreas.

Authors:  J R Haaga; R J Alfidi; M G Zelch; T F Meany; M Boller; L Gonzalez; G L Jelden
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts: a unified concept of management.

Authors:  E L Bradley; J L Clements; A C Gonzalez
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  Surgical management of inflammatory disorders of the pancreas.

Authors:  P Wolfson
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1980-11

9.  The diagnosis of pancreatic cyst by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography and ultrasonic scanning.

Authors:  B N Andersen; S Hancke; S A Nielsen; A Schmidt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  CT scanning and ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreatic pseudocysts: a preliminary comparison.

Authors:  H Y Kressel; A R Margulis; G W Gooding; R A Filly; A Moss; M Korobkin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: a critical and improvable determinant of outcome.

Authors:  B Cady; R L Jenkins; G D Steele; W D Lewis; M D Stone; W V McDermott; J M Jessup; A Bothe; P Lalor; E J Lovett; P Lavin; D C Linehan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Review of general surgery 1984-85.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  True solitary pancreatic cyst in an adult: report of a case.

Authors:  Pietro Fiamingo; Massimiliano Veroux; Enrico Gringeri; Roberto Mencarelli; Pierfrancesco Veroux; Carmelo Madia; Davide Francesco D'Amico
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Pancreatic pseudocysts: observation, endoscopic drainage, or resection?

Authors:  Markus M Lerch; Albrecht Stier; Ulrich Wahnschaffe; Julia Mayerle
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.594

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.