Literature DB >> 10972428

The psychological complexity of predictive testing for late onset neurogenetic diseases and hereditary cancers: implications for multidisciplinary counselling and for genetic education.

G Evers-Kiebooms1, M Welkenhuysen, E Claes, M Decruyenaere, L Denayer.   

Abstract

Increasing knowledge about the human genome has resulted in the availability of a steadily increasing number of predictive DNA-tests for two major categories of diseases: neurogenetic diseases and hereditary cancers. The psychological complexity of predictive testing for these late onset diseases requires careful consideration. It is the main aim of the present paper to describe this psychological complexity, which necessitates an adequate and systematic multidisciplinary approach, including psychological counselling, as well as ongoing education of professionals and of the general public. Predictive testing for neurogenetic diseases--in an adequate counselling context--so far elicits optimism regarding the short- and mid-term impact of the predictive test result. The psychosocial impact has been most widely studied for Huntington's disease. Longitudinal studies are of the utmost importance in evaluating the long-term impact of predictive testing for neurogenetic diseases on the tested person and his/her family. Given the more recent experience with predictive DNA-testing for hereditary cancers, fewer published scientific data are available. Longitudinal research on the mid- and long-term psychological impact of the predictive test result is essential. Decision making regarding health surveillance or preventive surgery after being detected as a carrier of one of the relevant mutations should receive special attention. Tailoring the professional approach--inside and outside genetic centres--to the families' needs is a continuous challenge. Even if a continuous effort is made, several important questions remain unanswered, last but not least the question regarding the best strategy to guarantee that the availability of predictive genetic testing results in a reduction of suffering caused by genetic disease and in an improvement of the quality of life of families confronted with genetic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10972428     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00064-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  25 in total

1.  Genetics Health Professionals' Views on Quality of Genetic Counseling Service Provision for Presymptomatic Testing in Late-Onset Neurological Diseases in Portugal: Core Components, Specific Challenges and the Need for Assessment Tools.

Authors:  M Paneque; Á Mendes; L Guimarães; J Sequeiros; H Skirton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Methodology in longitudinal studies on psychological effects of predictive DNA testing: a review.

Authors:  R Timman; T Stijnen; A Tibben
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  The Moral Reasoning of Genetic Dilemmas Amongst Jewish Israeli Undergraduate Students with Different Religious Affiliations and Scientific Backgrounds.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  To test or not to test? Moderators of the relationship between risk perceptions and interest in predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Shiri Ilan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-09-30

Review 5.  Clinical genetics in cardiology.

Authors:  Philippe Charron
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: a theoretical review.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Choosing not to know: accounts of non-engagement with pre-symptomatic testing for Machado-Joseph disease.

Authors:  Álvaro Mendes; Milena Paneque; Angus Clarke; Jorge Sequeiros
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  "In sickness and in health"? Disclosures of genetic risks in dating.

Authors:  Robert L Klitzman; Meghan M Sweeney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Quality issues concerning genetic counselling for presymptomatic testing: a European Delphi study.

Authors:  Milena Paneque; Jorge Sequeiros; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Genetics and genetic counseling: recommendations for Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

Authors:  Jennifer Williamson; Susan LaRusse
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.