Literature DB >> 10972220

Comparative long-term evaluation of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in pediatric liver transplantation.

A Jain1, G Mazariegos, R Kashyap, M Green, C Gronsky, T E Starzl, J Fung, J Reyes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this report, we compare the long-term outcome of pediatric liver transplantation (LTx) patients maintained with tacrolimus-based and with cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppressive therapy. We examine long-term patient and graft survival, the incidence of rejection, and immunosuppression-related complications.
METHOD: There were 233 consecutive primary LTx in children (ages <18 years) performed between October 1989 and December 1994 with tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy (Group I). These were compared with 120 consecutive primary LTx performed with CsA-based immunosuppressive therapy between January 1988 and October 1989(Group II). Children in both groups were followed until July 1999. Mean follow-up was 91.41+/-17.7 months (range 55.6-117.8) for Group I, and 128+/-6.1 months (range 116.7-138.6) for Group II.
RESULTS: At 9 years of follow-up, actuarial patient and graft survival were significantly improved (patient survival 85.41% in Group I vs. 63.8% in Group II, P=0.0001; graft survival Group I 78.9% vs. 60.8% Group II, P=0.0003) and the rate of re -transplantation was significantly lower among patients in Group I (12% in Group I vs. 22.5% in Group II P=0.01). Children in Group I also experienced a significantly reduced incidence of acute rejection (0.97 per patient Group I vs. 1.5 per patient Group II P=0.002) and significantly less steroid resistant acute rejection episodes (3.1% in Group I vs. 8.6% in Group II P=0.0001). The mean steroid dose was significantly lower in Group I compared with Group II at all time points (P=0.0001) after LTx. Freedom from steroid was also significantly higher in Group I compared with Group II at all time points after LTx (ranging from 78% to 84% in Group I and 9% to 32% in Group II during a 1- to 7-year posttransplant period P=0.0001). The rate of hypertension was significantly lower in Group I than Group II (P=0.0001), and the severity of hypertension (need for more than one anti-hypertensive medication) was also significantly lower in Group I than Group II (P=0.0001). Although the rate of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) was not significantly different (13.7% Group I vs.8.3% Group II, P=0.13), the survival after PTLD was significantly better for Group I at 81.2% than for Group II at 50% after 5 years (P=0.034). Conclusion. The results suggest that tacrolimus-based therapy provides significant long-term benefit to pediatric LTx patients, evidenced by significantly improved patient and graft survival, reduced rate of rejection, and hypertension with lower steroid doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10972220      PMCID: PMC2962406          DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200008270-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  37 in total

1.  Conversion from cyclosporine to FK 506 in liver allograft recipients with cyclosporine-related complications.

Authors:  J J Fung; S Todo; A Jain; J McCauley; M Alessiani; C Scotti; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Assay of FK 506 in plasma.

Authors:  E M Cadoff; R Venkataramanan; A Krajack; A S Jain; J J Fung; S Todo; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Early trials with FK 506 as primary treatment in liver transplantation.

Authors:  S Todo; J J Fung; A J Demetris; A Jain; R Venkataramanan; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Effect of hepatic dysfunction and T tube clamping on FK 506 pharmacokinetics and trough concentrations.

Authors:  A B Jain; R Venkataramanan; E Cadoff; J J Fung; S Todo; A Krajack; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Practical aspects of FK 506 analysis (Pittsburgh experience).

Authors:  V S Warty; R Venkataramanan; P Zendehrouh; S Mehta; T McKaveney; J Flowers; S Zuckerman; A Krajak; A Zeevi
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Conversion of liver allograft recipients from cyclosporine to FK 506-based immunosuppression: benefits and pitfalls.

Authors:  J J Fung; S Todo; A Tzakis; A Demetris; A Jain; K Abu-Elmaged; M Alessiani; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  Use of FK 506 in pediatric patients.

Authors:  A G Tzakis; J J Fung; S Todo; J Reyes; M Green; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.066

8.  Incidence and treatment of rejection episodes in primary orthotopic liver transplantation under FK 506.

Authors:  A B Jain; J J Fung; S Todo; M Alessiani; S Takaya; K Abu-Elmagd; A Tzakis; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Cyclosporine measurement by FPIA, PC-RIA, and HPLC following liver transplantation.

Authors:  G J Burckart; A Jain; W Diven; R Venkataramanan; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.066

10.  FK 506 for liver, kidney, and pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  T E Starzl; S Todo; J Fung; A J Demetris; R Venkataramman; A Jain
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-10-28       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  15 in total

1.  Pediatric liver transplantation in 808 consecutive children: 20-years experience from a single center.

Authors:  A Jain; G Mazariegos; R Kashyap; B Kosmach-Park; T E Starzl; J J Fung; J Reyes
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 2.  Posttransplant metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents after liver transplantation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emily Rothbaum Perito; Audrey Lau; Sue Rhee; John P Roberts; Philip Rosenthal
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 3.  Conversion from cyclosporin to tacrolimus in paediatric liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  G V Mazariegos; A A Salzedas; A Jain; J Reyes
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

4.  Does tacrolimus offer virtual freedom from chronic rejection after primary liver transplantation? Risk and prognostic factors in 1,048 liver transplantations with a mean follow-up of 6 years.

Authors:  A Jain; A J Demetris; R Kashyap; K Blakomer; K Ruppert; A Khan; S Rohal; T E Starzl; J J Fung
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.799

5.  Pediatric liver transplantation. A single center experience spanning 20 years.

Authors:  Ashok Jain; George Mazariegos; Randeep Kashyap; Beverly Kosmach-Park; T E Starzl; John Fung; Jorge Reyes
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Marco Spada; Silvia Riva; Giuseppe Maggiore; Davide Cintorino; Bruno Gridelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Management of acute rejection in paediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  D Thangarajah; M O'Meara; A Dhawan
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.022

8.  Exercise Performance in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients and Its Related Cardiac Function.

Authors:  Seyed Mohsen Dehghani; Mitra Moshref; Hamid Amoozgar; Seyed Ali Malek Hoseini; Saman Nikeghbalian
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Health status in young adults two decades after pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  S Mohammad; L Hormaza; K Neighbors; P Boone; M Tierney; R K Azzam; Z Butt; E M Alonso
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 10.  Therapy for acute rejection in pediatric organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Dominique Debray; Válerie Furlan; Véronique Baudouin; Lucile Houyel; Florence Lacaille; Christophe Chardot
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.