Literature DB >> 11923697

Pediatric liver transplantation. A single center experience spanning 20 years.

Ashok Jain1, George Mazariegos, Randeep Kashyap, Beverly Kosmach-Park, T E Starzl, John Fung, Jorge Reyes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Survival after liver transplantation has improved significantly over the last decade with pediatric recipients faring better than adults. The 20-year experience of pediatric liver transplantation at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh is reported in terms of patient survival; graft survival in relation to age, gender, and immunosuppressive protocols; causes of death; and indications for retransplantation.
METHOD: From March 1981 to April 1998, 808 children received liver transplants at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh. All patients were followed until March 2001, with a mean follow-up of 12.2+/-3.9 years (median=12.6; range=2.9-20). There were 405 female (50.2%) and 403 male (49.8%) pediatric recipients. Mean age at transplant was 5.3+/-4.9 years (mean=3.3; range 0.04-17.95), with 285 children (25.3%) being less than 2 years of age at transplant. Cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppression was used before November 1989 in 482 children (50.7%), and the subsequent 326 recipients (40.3%) were treated with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Actuarial survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier statistical method. Differences in survival were calculated by log-rank analysis.
RESULTS: Overall patient survival at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 77.1%, 72.6%, 69.4%, 65.8%, and 64.4%, respectively. There was no difference in survival for male or female patients at any time point. At up to 10 years posttransplant, the survival for children greater than 2 years of age (79.5%, 75.7%, and 71.6% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively) was slightly higher than those at less than 2 years of age (72.6%, 66.9%, and 65.3% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively). However, at 15 and 20 years posttransplant, survival rates were similar (>2 years=67.3% and 65.8%; <2 years=64.1% and 64.1%). A significant difference in survival was seen in CsA-based immunosuppression (71.2%, 68.1%, 65.4%, and 61%) versus tacrolimus-based immunosuppression (85.8%, 84.7%, 83.3%, and 82.9%) at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively (P=0.0001). The maximum difference in survival was noted in the first 3 months between CsA and tacrolimus; thus, indicating there may have been other factors (nonimmunological factors) involved in terms of donor and recipient selection and technical issues. The mean annual death rate beyond 2 years posttransplant was 0.47%, with the mean annual death rate for patients who received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression being significantly lower than those who received CsA-based immunosuppression (0.14% vs. 0.8%; P=0.001). The most common etiologies of graft loss were hepatic artery thrombosis (33.4%), acute or chronic rejection (26.6%), and primary nonfunction (16.7%). Of note, retransplantation for graft loss because of acute or chronic rejection occurred only in those patients who received CsA-based immuno-suppression.
CONCLUSION: The overall 20-year actuarial survival for pediatric liver transplantation is 64%. Survival has increased by 20% in the last 12 years with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Although this improvement may be the result of several factors, retransplantation as a result of acute or chronic rejection has been completely eliminated in patients treated with tacrolimus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11923697      PMCID: PMC2975975          DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200203270-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  28 in total

1.  Efficacy of tacrolimus as rescue therapy for chronic rejection in orthotopic liver transplantation: a report of the U.S. Multicenter Liver Study Group.

Authors:  L S Sher; C A Cosenza; J Michel; L Makowka; C M Miller; M E Schwartz; R Busuttil; S McDiarmid; J F Burdick; A S Klein; C Esquivel; G Klintmalm; M Levy; J P Roberts; J R Lake; M Kalayoglu; A M D'Alessandro; R D Gordon; A C Stieber; B W Shaw; J R Thistlethwaite; P Whittington; R H Wiesner; M Porayko; A B Cosimi
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Comparison of cyclosporine- vs tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  W S Andrews; J Sommerauer; C Conlin; P Moore
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Liver transplantation in Birmingham: indications, results, and changes.

Authors:  D F Mirza; B K Gunson; P McMaster
Journal:  Clin Transpl       Date:  1996

4.  An analysis of late deaths after liver transplantation.

Authors:  S Asfar; P Metrakos; J Fryer; D Verran; C Ghent; D Grant; M Bloch; P Burns; W Wall
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Infant pediatric liver transplantation results equal those for older pediatric patients.

Authors:  W J Van der Werf; A M D'Alessandro; S J Knechtle; G Pilli; R M Hoffmann; R H Judd; J S Odorico; A D Kirk; S C Rayhill; H W Sollinger; M Kalayoglu
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  10 years of pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  W Andrews; J Sommerauer; J Roden; J Andersen; C Conlin; P Moore
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure in the pediatric patient.

Authors:  J A Goss; C R Shackleton; M Maggard; K Swenson; P Seu; S V McDiarmid; R W Busuttil
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-08

8.  Rejection after pediatric liver transplantation is not the limiting factor to survival.

Authors:  S P Dunn; D F Billmire; K Falkenstein; C D Vinocur; R Myers; J P Lawrence; W H Weintraub
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Long-term results of pediatric liver transplantation: an analysis of 569 transplants.

Authors:  J A Goss; C R Shackleton; S V McDiarmid; M Maggard; K Swenson; P Seu; J Vargas; M Martin; M Ament; J Brill; R Harrison; R W Busuttil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  FK506 (tacrolimus) compared with cyclosporine for primary immunosuppression after pediatric liver transplantation. Results from the U.S. Multicenter Trial.

Authors:  S V McDiarmid; R W Busuttil; N L Ascher; J Burdick; A M D'Alessandro; C Esquivel; M Kalayoglu; A S Klein; J W Marsh; C M Miller
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1995-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Transplantation immunology: solid organ and bone marrow.

Authors:  Javier Chinen; Rebecca H Buckley
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 2.  Coagulopathy and transfusion therapy in pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Mirco Nacoti; Davide Corbella; Francesco Fazzi; Francesca Rapido; Ezio Bonanomi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in liver recipients: Characteristics, management, and outcome from a single-centre experience with >1000 liver transplantations.

Authors:  Khalid Mumtaz; Nabiha Faisal; Max Marquez; Alicia Healey; Leslie B Lilly; Eberhard L Renner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 4.  [Long-term results after liver transplantation].

Authors:  H Schrem; N Till; T Becker; H Bektas; M P Manns; C P Strassburg; J Klempnauer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Risk factors for rejection and infection in pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  R W Shepherd; Y Turmelle; M Nadler; J A Lowell; M R Narkewicz; S V McDiarmid; R Anand; C Song
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Proliferative alloresponse of T-cytotoxic cells identifies rejection-prone children with steroid-free liver transplantation.

Authors:  Chethan Ashokkumar; Qing Sun; Ankit Gupta; Brandon W Higgs; Tamara Fazzolare; Lisa Remaley; George Mazariegos; Kyle Soltys; Geoffrey Bond; Rakesh Sindhi
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  Genetic variants in major histocompatibility complex-linked genes associate with pediatric liver transplant rejection.

Authors:  Rakesh Sindhi; Brandon W Higgs; Daniel E Weeks; Chethan Ashokkumar; Ronald Jaffe; Cecilia Kim; Patrick Wilson; Nydia Chien; Joseph Glessner; Anjan Talukdar; George Mazariegos; M Michael Barmada; Edward Frackleton; Nancy Petro; Andrew Eckert; Hakon Hakonarson; Robert Ferrell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders in liver transplantation: a 20-year experience.

Authors:  Ashok Jain; Mike Nalesnik; Jorge Reyes; Renu Pokharna; George Mazariegos; Michael Green; Bijan Eghtesad; Wallis Marsh; Thomas Cacciarelli; Paulo Fontes; Kareem Abu-Elmagd; Rakesh Sindhi; Jake Demetris; John Fung
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Allospecific CD154+ T cells associate with rejection risk after pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  C Ashokkumar; A Talukdar; Q Sun; B W Higgs; J Janosky; P Wilson; G Mazariegos; R Jaffe; A Demetris; J Dobberstein; K Soltys; G Bond; A W Thomson; A Zeevi; R Sindhi
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 10.  Tacrolimus: a further update of its use in the management of organ transplantation.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott; Kate McKeage; Susan J Keam; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.