Literature DB >> 10970970

[Quality of life assessment one year after total hip or knee arthroplasty].

D Mainard1, F Guillemin, C Cuny, E Mejat-Adler, L Galois, J Delagoutte.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The development of quality of life (QOL) instruments has made it possible to obtain an objective assessment of the impact of surgical procedures taking into consideration the physical, psychological and social aspects of the patient's everyday activities. The aim of this work was to evaluate the short-term and long-term course of QOL after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included a prospective multicentric cohort of patients with a first intention indication for degenerative bone and joint disease. Clinical assessment was obtained preoperatively and 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. The Merle d'Aubigné and Harris scores were determined for THA and the Hospital Special Surgery score for TKA. Clinical data (pain, walking distance), and QOL scores [French version of the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and the French version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2 (AIMS2)] were also obtained.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients had a THA (mean age 62 years) and 60 had a TKA (mean age 68 years). Preoperative clinical features were those commonly found in these populations. For THA, the 6-week, 6-month and 1-year assessments showed an improvement (2.7 and 2.8 points on the 0 to 10 NHP). For TKA, improvement came later and was less significant with 0.8, 1.8 and 1.5 point improvements. The AIMS 2 did not appear to be perfectly adapted to measure this dimension. Improvement in pain came earlier and was greater for THA than for TKA on all measurement scales. For THA, psychological capacity improved by 0.7, 1.4 and 1.5 points on the 0 to 10 AIMS 2 at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months respectively. For TKA, improvement was to the same order with 1.1 and 1.2 point improvements at 6 weeks and 6 months respectively. DISCUSSION: These findings confirm the clear improvement in QOL after THA and TKA, mainly due to physical and psychological dimensions. The QOL measurements allow comparisons with other surgical procedures in other fields. They provide supplementary information, notably concerning pain and are particularly useful in orthopedic surgery. The questionnaires are generally well accepted by the patients, particularly short self-administered questionnaires. They provide useful information on the efficacy of THA and TKA in terms of human and social costs and open new perspectives for analysis of prognostic factors for optimal QOL of operated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10970970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot        ISSN: 0035-1040


  15 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: an Asian perspective.

Authors:  Matthew Dhanaraj Thambiah; Sahaya Nathan; Branden Z X Seow; Shen Liang; Krishna Lingaraj
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Importance of patient satisfaction with care in predicting osteoarthritis-specific health-related quality of life one year after total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cédric Baumann; Anne-Christine Rat; Didier Mainard; Christian Cuny; Francis Guillemin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Effect of Preoperative Diabetes on the Achievement of Forgotten Knee Status in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sanjay Bhalchandra Londhe; Ravi Vinod Shah; Amit Pankaj Doshi; Kavita Subhedar; Atul Ranade; Nicholas Antao
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  Treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients over 60 years of age - which is the ideal modality of primary joint replacement?

Authors:  Christian Ossendorf; Max J Scheyerer; Guido A Wanner; Hans-Peter Simmen; Clément Ml Werner
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2010-10-20

5.  Clinical and functional results after the rehabilitation period in minimally-invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Susanne Fuchs; Bernd Rolauffs; Thorsten Plaumann; Carsten O Tibesku; Dieter Rosenbaum
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-01-25

7.  Satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement predicts self-perceived health status after surgery.

Authors:  Cédric Baumann; Anne Christine Rat; Georges Osnowycz; Didier Mainard; Christian Cuny; Francis Guillemin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Aseptic Loosening.

Authors:  Yuichi Kuroda; Shinya Hayashi; Shingo Hashimoto; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Koji Takayama; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Determinants of pain, functional limitations and health-related quality of life six months after total knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Clermont E Dionne; Étienne L Belzile; Renée Bourbonnais; François Champagne; Pierre Frémont; François Desmeules
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-28

10.  Knee arthroplasty: disabilities in comparison to the general population and to hip arthroplasty using a French national longitudinal survey.

Authors:  Agnes Dechartres; Isabelle Boutron; Remy Nizard; Serge Poiraudeau; Carine Roy; Gabriel Baron; Philippe Ravaud; Jean-François Ravaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.