Literature DB >> 10968228

Absence of nerve specificity in human cutaneous reflexes during standing.

T Komiyama1, E P Zehr, R B Stein.   

Abstract

Cutaneous reflexes in lower limb muscles were recorded from healthy human subjects after non-noxious electrical stimulation of superficial peroneal (SP), sural and distal tibial nerves while subjects: (1) made graded voluntary contractions of the ankle and knee extensor and flexor muscles while mimicking late stance or heel strike limb positions; and (2) walked on a treadmill at speeds of 2 and 4 km/h. During standing, net reflexes were predominantly suppressive and graded with background EMG. In contrast, during walking net reflexes were mostly facilitatory and uncorrelated with background EMG. Opposite signs (negative during standing, positive during walking) and significant differences of the reflex ratio (net reflex/background EMG) were seen in most leg muscles. The nerve stimulated did not determine the sign of the net reflex while standing: nerve specificity was absent. We suggest that during standing, where maintenance of posture is of primary importance, there is a reduction of effort that led to increased cutaneous input (i.e., a global suppressive response), while during walking there is a modulation of reflexes which is independent of muscle activation level but closely tied to events occurring in the step cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10968228     DOI: 10.1007/s002210000411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  33 in total

1.  Modulation of human cutaneous reflexes during rhythmic cyclical arm movement.

Authors:  E P Zehr; R Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neural control of rhythmic, cyclical human arm movement: task dependency, nerve specificity and phase modulation of cutaneous reflexes.

Authors:  E P Zehr; A Kido
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Modulation of cutaneous reflexes in arm muscles during walking: further evidence of similar control mechanisms for rhythmic human arm and leg movements.

Authors:  E Paul Zehr; Carlos Haridas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Neuromuscular and biomechanical coupling in human cycling: modulation of cutaneous reflex responses to sural nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Katya Mileva; David A Green; Duncan L Turner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Tuning of the excitability of transcortical cutaneous reflex pathways during mirror-like activity.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Ohtsuka; Syusaku Sasada; Tsuyoshi Nakajima; Genki Futatsubashi; Eiji Shimizu; Tomoyoshi Komiyama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Goal-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch response at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weiler; Paul L Gribble; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Phase-dependent reversal of the crossed conditioning effect on the soleus Hoffmann reflex from cutaneous afferents during walking in humans.

Authors:  Shinya Suzuki; Tsuyoshi Nakajima; Genki Futatsubashi; Rinaldo A Mezzarane; Hiroyuki Ohtsuka; Yukari Ohki; Tomoyoshi Komiyama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Phase-dependent and task-dependent modulation of stretch reflexes during rhythmical hand tasks in humans.

Authors:  Ruiping Xia; Brian M H Bush; Gregory M Karst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Cutaneous reflexes during rhythmic arm cycling are insensitive to asymmetrical changes in crank length.

Authors:  Sandra R Hundza; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.