Literature DB >> 10967004

Healthy births and ongoing pregnancies obtained by preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with advanced maternal age and recurrent implantation failure.

S Kahraman1, M Bahçe, H Samli, N Imirzalioğlu, K Yakisn, G Cengiz, E Dönmez.   

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and subsequent embryo development was evaluated in 72 couples presenting at our centre for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) due to severe male factor. The embryo biopsies were performed in Ca(2+)/Mg(2+)-free medium. These patients were further divided into those with advanced maternal age (AMA, n = 49) and those with recurrent implantation failure (RIF, n = 23). Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) was carried out on 329 blastomeres (91.3%) with probes for the X, Y, 13, 18 and 21 chromosomes. The chromosomal abnormality rate was 41.3% with no significant difference between the AMA and RIF groups. Aneuploidy accounted for the majority (72.8%) of chromosomal abnormalities. Out of 329 embryos, 84.2% had cleaved after 24 h and 15.1% had arrested. Embryos were transferred in 70 patients and 22 pregnancies were achieved (31.4% with an ongoing pregnancy rate of 28.5%). There were no significant differences between the pregnancy rates of the AMA and RIF groups (32.5 and 30% respectively). Therefore PGD should be offered to patients with AMA and RIF. Furthermore, the use of Ca(2+)/Mg(2+)-free medium during the blastomere biopsy facilitates the procedure, while further embryo cleavage, ongoing pregnancies and healthy births are possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10967004     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.9.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  13 in total

1.  Discordance among blastomeres renders preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ineffective.

Authors:  C B Coulam; R S Jeyendran; M Fiddler; E Pergament
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Down syndrome pregnancy.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Chen-ming Xu; Yi-min Zhu; Min-yue Dong; Yu-li Qian; Fan Jin; He-feng Huang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 3.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Establishment and characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines, Turkey perspectives.

Authors:  Zafer Nihat Candan; Semra Kahraman
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.416

5.  Comparison of aneuploidy frequencies between in vitro matured and unstimulated cycles oocytes by metaphase comparative genomic hybridization (mCGH).

Authors:  Tahsin Yakut; Mutlu Karkucak; Geoffrey Sher; Levent Keskintepe
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Different probe combinations for assessment of postzygotic chromosomal imbalances in human embryos.

Authors:  Magdalena Bielanska; Seang Lin Tan; Asangla Ao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Association between amino acid turnover and chromosome aneuploidy during human preimplantation embryo development in vitro.

Authors:  Helen M Picton; Kay Elder; Franchesca D Houghton; Judith A Hawkhead; Anthony J Rutherford; Jan E Hogg; Henry J Leese; Sarah E Harris
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 8.  Safety paradigm: genetic evaluation of therapeutic grade human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Emma Stephenson; Caroline Mackie Ogilvie; Heema Patel; Glenda Cornwell; Laureen Jacquet; Neli Kadeva; Peter Braude; Dusko Ilic
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Single-cell whole-genome amplification technique impacts the accuracy of SNP microarray-based genotyping and copy number analyses.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Jing Su; Xin Tao; Lesley E Northrop; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 10.  Methods for comprehensive chromosome screening of oocytes and embryos: capabilities, limitations, and evidence of validity.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.