Literature DB >> 10966977

Sex selection and preimplantation diagnosis: a response to the Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine.

J Savulescu1, E Dahl.   

Abstract

In its recent statement 'Sex Selection and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis', the Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine concluded that preimplantation genetic diagnosis for sex selection for non-medical reasons should be discouraged because it poses a risk of unwarranted gender bias, social harm, and results in the diversion of medical resources from genuine medical need. We critically examine the arguments presented against sex selection using preimplantation genetic diagnosis. We argue that sex selection should be available, at least within privately funded health care.

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10966977     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.9.1879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  11 in total

1.  Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: empirical evidence from Germany, the UK, and the US.

Authors:  E Dahl; M Beutel; B Brosig; S Grüssner; Y Stöbel-Richter; H-R Tinneberg; Elmar Brähler
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-09-17       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Consequentialism without consequences: ethics and embryo research.

Authors:  Sarah Chan; John Harris
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  An empirically informed critique of Habermas' argument from human nature.

Authors:  Nicolae Morar
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  A Feminist Critique of Justifications for Sex Selection.

Authors:  Tereza Hendl
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  How Sex Selection Undermines Reproductive Autonomy.

Authors:  Tamara Kayali Browne
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Justice in the context of family balancing.

Authors:  Michelle L McGowan; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  2013-03-01

7.  Ethical attitudes of German specialists in reproductive medicine and legal regulation of preimplantation sex selection in Germany.

Authors:  Miriam Wilhelm; Edgar Dahl; Henry Alexander; Elmar Brähler; Yve Stöbel-Richter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prenatal screening, reproductive choice, and public health.

Authors:  Stephen Wilkinson
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.898

9.  Sex selection from Islamic point of view.

Authors:  Lotfollah Dezhkam; Hakime Dezhkam; Iman Dezhkam
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-04

10.  High and growing disapproval of sex-selection technology in Australia.

Authors:  Rebecca Kippen; Edith Gray; Ann Evans
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.