Literature DB >> 10966779

Automatic protein design with all atom force-fields by exact and heuristic optimization.

L Wernisch1, S Hery, S J Wodak.   

Abstract

A fully automatic procedure for predicting the amino acid sequences compatible with a given target structure is described. It is based on the CHARMM package, and uses an all atom force-field and rotamer libraries to describe and evaluate side-chain types and conformations. Sequences are ranked by a quantity akin to the free energy of folding, which incorporates hydration effects. Exact (Branch and Bound) and heuristic optimisation procedures are used to identifying highly scoring sequences from an astronomical number of possibilities. These sequences include the minimum free energy sequence, as well as all amino acid sequences whose free energy lies within a specified window from the minimum. Several applications of our procedure are illustrated. Prediction of side-chain conformations for a set of ten proteins yields results comparable to those of established side-chain placement programs. Applications to sequence optimisation comprise the re-design of the protein cores of c-Crk SH3 domain, the B1 domain of protein G and Ubiquitin, and of surface residues of the SH3 domain. In all calculations, no restrictions are imposed on the amino acid composition and identical parameter settings are used for core and surface residues. The best scoring sequences for the protein cores are virtually identical to wild-type. They feature no more than one to three mutations in a total of 11-16 variable positions. Tests suggest that this is due to the balance between various contributions in the force-field rather than to overwhelming influence from packing constraints. The effectiveness of our force-field is further supported by the sequence predictions for surface residues of the SH3 domain. More mutations are predicted than in the core, seemingly in order to optimise the network of complementary interactions between polar and charged groups. This appears to be an important energetic requirement in absence of the partner molecules with which the SH3 domain interacts, which were not included in the calculations. Finally, a detailed comparison between the sequences generated by the heuristic and exact optimisation algorithms, commends a note of caution concerning the efficiency of heuristic procedures in exploring sequence space. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10966779     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  25 in total

1.  Protein topology and stability define the space of allowed sequences.

Authors:  Patrice Koehl; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Identifying residue-residue clashes in protein hybrids by using a second-order mean-field approach.

Authors:  Gregory L Moore; Costas D Maranas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Thoroughly sampling sequence space: large-scale protein design of structural ensembles.

Authors:  Stefan M Larson; Jeremy L England; John R Desjarlais; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Folding free energy function selects native-like protein sequences in the core but not on the surface.

Authors:  Alfonso Jaramillo; Lorenz Wernisch; Stéphanie Héry; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Computational protein design is a challenge for implicit solvation models.

Authors:  Alfonso Jaramillo; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Improved side-chain prediction accuracy using an ab initio potential energy function and a very large rotamer library.

Authors:  Ronald W Peterson; P Leslie Dutton; A Joshua Wand
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Extending Iterative Protein Redesign and Optimization (IPRO) in protein library design for ligand specificity.

Authors:  Hossein Fazelinia; Patrick C Cirino; Costas D Maranas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Toward full-sequence de novo protein design with flexible templates for human beta-defensin-2.

Authors:  Ho Ki Fung; Christodoulos A Floudas; Martin S Taylor; Li Zhang; Dimitrios Morikis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Evaluating and optimizing computational protein design force fields using fixed composition-based negative design.

Authors:  Oscar Alvizo; Stephen L Mayo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Energy functions in de novo protein design: current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Zhixiu Li; Yuedong Yang; Jian Zhan; Liang Dai; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.