C M Swartz1, D T Manly. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, IL62794-9642, USA. ectdoc@pol.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Greater ECT stimulus efficiency allows for a lower stimulus dose and should diminish the side effects of ECT. METHOD: Four different ECT stimuli of identical charge (average mC=2.5 times age) with pulse widths of 0.5 msec and 1 msec and frequencies of 30 Hz and 60 Hz, respectively, were compared for efficiency. The stimuli were applied in a balanced order to each of 24 subjects. Asymmetric bilateral electrode placement was used. RESULTS: Peak heart rates were higher with the 0.5-msec pulse width than the 1-msec pulse width. Seizure induction was more successful with the 0. 5-msec pulse width than the 1-msec pulse width. Stimulus frequency had no effect on heart rate or seizure induction. CONCLUSIONS: The pulse width of 0.5 msec is more efficient than the 1-msec pulse width. The "half-age" dose for the first bilateral ECT treatment is usually successful for subsequent ECTs when the 0.5-msec pulse width is used.
OBJECTIVE: Greater ECT stimulus efficiency allows for a lower stimulus dose and should diminish the side effects of ECT. METHOD: Four different ECT stimuli of identical charge (average mC=2.5 times age) with pulse widths of 0.5 msec and 1 msec and frequencies of 30 Hz and 60 Hz, respectively, were compared for efficiency. The stimuli were applied in a balanced order to each of 24 subjects. Asymmetric bilateral electrode placement was used. RESULTS: Peak heart rates were higher with the 0.5-msec pulse width than the 1-msec pulse width. Seizure induction was more successful with the 0. 5-msec pulse width than the 1-msec pulse width. Stimulus frequency had no effect on heart rate or seizure induction. CONCLUSIONS: The pulse width of 0.5 msec is more efficient than the 1-msec pulse width. The "half-age" dose for the first bilateral ECT treatment is usually successful for subsequent ECTs when the 0.5-msec pulse width is used.
Authors: Stefan B Rowny; Yael M Cycowicz; Shawn M McClintock; Matthew D Truesdale; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-06-02 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Aida de Arriba-Arnau; Virginia Soria; Neus Salvat-Pujol; José M Menchón; Mikel Urretavizcaya Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2019-12-13 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Preeti Sinha; A ShyamSundar; Jagadisha Thirthalli; B N Gangadhar; Vittal S Candade Journal: Indian J Psychiatry Date: 2016 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 1.759