Literature DB >> 10964315

Magnetic resonance imaging versus clinical palpation in evaluating cervical metastasis from head and neck cancer.

S P Hao1, S H Ng.   

Abstract

We prospectively compared the value of MRI and clinical palpation for detecting cervical metastases in patients with primary cancer of the head and neck. Sixty patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract were evaluated with MRI and clinical palpation before undergoing a total of 81 neck dissections. The results of preoperative clinical palpation and MRI were compared with the histopathologic outcome. The sensitivity and specificity were 75.6% and 97.5%, respectively, for clinical palpation and 73.2% and 95%, respectively, for MRI. The rate of occult cervical metastasis was 24% with clinical palpation and 26.8% with MRI. The use of MRI did not improve the rate of early detection of occult metastasis, nor did it improve the detection of extracapsular spread. Our findings show that we could not depend on palpation or MRI alone to determine the need for elective neck dissection. However, MRI can be used to improve the preoperative grading of cervical lymph nodes. In selected cases, this may direct surgeons to convert the treatment plan to choose a more conservative neck dissection or, after sentinel node sampling and frozen-section control, to convert the treatment to a more radical dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10964315     DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.105252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  7 in total

Review 1.  Management of the clinically negative (N0) neck.

Authors:  Karen T Pitman; Robert Dean
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  The diagnostic performance of CT and MRI for detecting extranodal extension in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sang Ik Park; Jeffrey P Guenette; Chong Hyun Suh; Glenn J Hanna; Sae Rom Chung; Jung Hwan Baek; Jeong Hyun Lee; Young Jun Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Restaging [18F] fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan in recurrent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Diagnostic performance and prognostic significance.

Authors:  Sonia Mahajan; Christopher A Barker; Audrey Mauguen; Bhuvanesh Singh; Neeta Pandit-Taskar
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Assessment of metastatic cervical adenopathy using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Nancy J Fischbein; Susan M Noworolski; Roland G Henry; Michael J Kaplan; William P Dillon; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Imaging in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Zoran Rumboldt; Leonie Gordon; Leonie Gordon; Rick Bonsall; Susan Ackermann
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2006-01

Review 6.  Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastasis of head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Sun; B Li; C J Li; Y Li; F Su; Q H Gao; F L Wu; T Yu; L Wu; L J Li
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The Role of PET-CT in Evaluation of Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinomas.

Authors:  Fatma Çaylaklı; Serkan Yılmaz; Cem Özer; Mehmet Reyhan
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.