Literature DB >> 10963166

Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty with a proximal femoral modular cemented stem.

S A Crawford1, P D Siney, B M Wroblewski.   

Abstract

We have designed a modular cemented femoral component for revision of failed total hip arthroplasty in which deficiency of the proximal femur is such as to require a variable extrafemoral portion of the stem. We present the results of the first 74 operations in 72 patients; 56 of the patients had grade-3 or grade-4 femoral deficiency as defined by Gustilo and Pasternak and 24 had fractures of the proximal femur, of which 22 were periprosthetic. There was or had been infection in 19 hips. At a mean follow-up of 5 years 9 months (1 to 12 years) nine stems were radiologically loose of which three had been revised. There were no failures in 45 cases in which there was fixation of the distal stem of 10 cm or more. Dislocation occurred in nine patients and there were four cases of infection in the 19 which were, or had been, infected previously. There were no neurovascular complications and no intraoperative femoral fractures. The femoral bone stock improved radiologically in 45 hips of which 29 showed considerable reformation of the proximal femur; 27 remained unchanged and two showed increasing osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10963166     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b5.10685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  6 in total

Review 1.  Management bone loss of the proximal femur in revision hip arthroplasty: Update on reconstructive options.

Authors:  Vasileios I Sakellariou; George C Babis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

2.  The Modular Universal Tumour And Revision System (MUTARS®) in endoprosthetic revision surgery.

Authors:  Carsten Gebert; Martin Wessling; Christian Götze; Georg Gosheger; Jendrik Hardes
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Titanium modular revision prosthesis stem in revision hip prosthesis].

Authors:  A Schuh; U Holzwarth; G Zeiler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision?

Authors:  Slif D Ulrich; Thorsten M Seyler; Derek Bennett; Ronald E Delanois; Khaled J Saleh; Issada Thongtrangan; Michael Kuskowski; Edward Y Cheng; Peter F Sharkey; Javad Parvizi; James B Stiehl; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection is not Inferior to Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jbt Lim; H N Pang; Kjd Tay; S L Chia; S J Yeo; N N Lo
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2020-11

6.  USE OF CORTICAL STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGOUS BONE GRAFT IN FEMORAL RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY.

Authors:  Milton Valdomiro Roos; Bruno Dutra Roos; Taís Stedile Busin Giora; Thiago Martins Taglietti
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.