Literature DB >> 10962698

Age-related changes of defocus-specific contrast sensitivity in healthy subjects.

Y K Nio1, N M Jansonius, V Fidler, E Geraghty, S Norrby, A C Kooijman.   

Abstract

To investigate the effect of defocus on contrast sensitivity as a function of age in healthy subjects, the through focus contrast sensitivity was measured in 100 healthy subjects aged 20-69. Defocus-specific changes in contrast sensitivity reflect age-related changes in the optics of the eye. Tests were performed in cycloplegic eyes varying artificial pupil size (2, 4 and 6 mm), defocus (-1 to +2 D), and spatial frequency (1-16 cpd). Integrated contrast sensitivity was taken as a measure for the total amount of visual information transferred by the optical media. At optimal focus, integrated contrast sensitivity and log contrast sensitivity at 8 cpd showed a significant age-related decline. The log contrast sensitivity at 1 cpd appeared to be independent of age. The depth of focus for a 4-mm pupil increased significantly with age, even though contrast sensitivity at +2 D defocus decreases with age too, but not as much as the contrast sensitivity at optimal focus. Our study indicates that the effect of defocus on contrast sensitivity decreases with age; this was attributed to age-related changes in the optical media.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10962698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  12 in total

1.  Optical performance of toric intraocular lenses in the presence of decentration.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Jin-Xue Ma; Dan-Yan Liu; Ying-Hua Du; Cong-Rong Guo; Yue-Xian Cui
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  [The aspheric blue light filter IOL AcrySof IQ compared to the AcrySof SA60AT : influence of IOL power, pupil diameter, and corneal asphericity on postoperative spherical aberration].

Authors:  U Mester; H Kaymak
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Visual acuity of dentists in their respective clinical conditions.

Authors:  Philippe Perrin; Simon T Ramseyer; Martina Eichenberger; Adrian Lussi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effects of accommodation training on accommodation and depth of focus in an eye implanted with a crystalens intraocular lens.

Authors:  Humza J Tahir; Jian L Tong; Sydney Geissler; Indu Vedamurthy; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  [Aspheric intraocular lenses].

Authors:  T Kohnen; O K Klaproth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.174

6.  Influence of multiple sclerosis, age and degree of disability, in the position of the contrast sensitivity curve peak.

Authors:  A F Nunes; P M L Monteiro; M Vaz Pato
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Normal range of cambridge low contrast test; a population based study.

Authors:  Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Akbar Fotouhi; Hassan Hashemi; Abbas Ali Yekta; Javad Heravian; Tahereh Abdolahinia; Reza Norouzi Rad; Soheila Asgari; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2014-01

8.  Effects of intraocular lenses with different diopters on chromatic aberrations in human eye models.

Authors:  Hui Song; Xiaoyong Yuan; Xin Tang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Immature visual neural system in children reflected by contrast sensitivity with adaptive optics correction.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Jiawei Zhou; Haoxin Zhao; Yun Dai; Yudong Zhang; Yong Tang; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Differential effects of aging on spatial contrast sensitivity to linear and polar sine-wave gratings.

Authors:  T L Costa; R M T B L Nogueira; A G F Pereira; N A Santos
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.