Literature DB >> 10962614

Recognition of unfamiliar faces.

.   

Abstract

People are excellent at identifying faces familiar to them, even from very low quality images, but are bad at recognizing, or even matching, unfamiliar faces. In this review we shall consider some of the factors that affect our abilities to match unfamiliar faces. Major differences in orientation (e.g. inversion) or greyscale information (e.g. negation) affect face processing dramatically, and such effects suggest that representations derived from unfamiliar faces are based on relatively low-level image descriptions. Consistent with this, even relatively minor differences in lighting and viewpoint create problems for human face matching, leading to potentially important problems for the use of images from security videos. The relationships between different parts of the face (its 'configuration') are as important to the impression created of an upright face as the local features themselves, suggesting further constraints on the representations derived from faces. We go on to consider the contribution of computer face-recognition systems to the understanding of the theory and the practical problems of face identification. Finally, we look to the future of research in this area that will incorporate motion and 3-D shape information.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10962614     DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01519-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  90 in total

1.  Dissociation of human and computer voices in the brain: evidence for a preattentive gestalt-like perception.

Authors:  Sonja Lattner; Burkhard Maess; Yunhua Wang; Michael Schauer; Kai Alter; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neural microgenesis of personally familiar face recognition.

Authors:  Meike Ramon; Luca Vizioli; Joan Liu-Shuang; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The role of long-term and short-term familiarity in visual and haptic face recognition.

Authors:  Sarah J Casey; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Recognition memory for distractor faces depends on attentional load at exposure.

Authors:  Rob Jenkins; Nilli Lavie; Jon Driver
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

6.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching task.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

7.  Comparing the face to the body, which is better for identification?

Authors:  Teghan Lucas; Maciej Henneberg
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Memory facilitation for emotional faces: Visual working memory trade-offs resulting from attentional preference for emotional facial expressions.

Authors:  Hyejin J Lee; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

9.  The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners' Facial Photographs : A Conjoint Analysis Study.

Authors:  Justin K Mogilski; Lisa L M Welling
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2017-03

10.  Investigating representations of facial identity in human ventral visual cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Juha Silvanto; Dietrich S Schwarzkopf; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.