OBJECTIVES: To describe an electrophysiological method for determining the relation between lumbar cord dorsal roots and cathode of epidural electrode for spinal cord stimulation (SCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data has been collected from 13 subjects who have been under evaluation of effectiveness of SCS for control of spasticity. Induced muscle twitches from both quadriceps (Q), adductors (A), hamstrings (H), tibial anterior muscles (TA) and triceps surae muscles (TS) were simultaneously recorded with surface-electrode polyelectromyography (pEMG) and analyzed for amplitudes, latency times and recruitment order. RESULTS: Stimulation of dorsal lumbar cord structures evoked characteristic EMG events during muscle twitch responses. Their amplitudes varied with stimulus strength. Latency times were rather invariable regardless of stimulus strength. Two distinct recruitment orders were demonstrated depending on whether the stimulating cathode was placed over the upper (=response from quadriceps and/or adductor muscles) or the lower (=response from tibialis anterior and triceps surae) lumbar cord segments. The chances to stimulate upper lumbar cord segments are best around the 12th thoracic vertebra. CONCLUSIONS: pEMG recording of muscle twitches enables us to accurately differentiate between upper and lower lumbar cord segments. Furthermore, our findings regarding amplitude, latency and recruitment order strongly suggest that we stimulate posterior roots not posterior columns of the lumbar spinal cord.
OBJECTIVES: To describe an electrophysiological method for determining the relation between lumbar cord dorsal roots and cathode of epidural electrode for spinal cord stimulation (SCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data has been collected from 13 subjects who have been under evaluation of effectiveness of SCS for control of spasticity. Induced muscle twitches from both quadriceps (Q), adductors (A), hamstrings (H), tibial anterior muscles (TA) and triceps surae muscles (TS) were simultaneously recorded with surface-electrode polyelectromyography (pEMG) and analyzed for amplitudes, latency times and recruitment order. RESULTS: Stimulation of dorsal lumbar cord structures evoked characteristic EMG events during muscle twitch responses. Their amplitudes varied with stimulus strength. Latency times were rather invariable regardless of stimulus strength. Two distinct recruitment orders were demonstrated depending on whether the stimulating cathode was placed over the upper (=response from quadriceps and/or adductor muscles) or the lower (=response from tibialis anterior and triceps surae) lumbar cord segments. The chances to stimulate upper lumbar cord segments are best around the 12th thoracic vertebra. CONCLUSIONS: pEMG recording of muscle twitches enables us to accurately differentiate between upper and lower lumbar cord segments. Furthermore, our findings regarding amplitude, latency and recruitment order strongly suggest that we stimulate posterior roots not posterior columns of the lumbar spinal cord.
Authors: B Jilge; K Minassian; F Rattay; M M Pinter; F Gerstenbrand; H Binder; M R Dimitrijevic Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2003-10-25 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Ursula S Hofstoetter; William B McKay; Keith E Tansey; Winfried Mayr; Helmut Kern; Karen Minassian Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Ursula S Hofstoetter; Simon M Danner; Brigitta Freundl; Heinrich Binder; Winfried Mayr; Frank Rattay; Karen Minassian Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Dimitry G Sayenko; Mrinal Rath; Adam R Ferguson; Joel W Burdick; Leif A Havton; V Reggie Edgerton; Yury P Gerasimenko Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-12-15 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Simon M Danner; Ursula S Hofstoetter; Brigitta Freundl; Heinrich Binder; Winfried Mayr; Frank Rattay; Karen Minassian Journal: Brain Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 13.501