Literature DB >> 10960992

The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations.

Y Ciftçi1, S Canay.   

Abstract

In this study, the effect of various materials used in fabricating superstructures for implant-retained fixed partial dentures on stress distribution around implant tissues was investigated. Five different mathematical models consisting of 11,361 nodes and 54,598 elements were constructed to study porcelain, gold alloy, composite resin, reinforced composite resin, and acrylic resin veneering materials using the 3-dimensional finite element analysis method. MARC K7.2/Mentat 3.2 software was used for the analysis. Reference points were determined on the cortical bone, where perpendicular, oblique, and horizontal forces were applied. Stress values created by oblique and horizontal forces appeared to be higher than those created by vertical forces. Stress seemed to be concentrated at the cortical bone around the cervical region of the implant. Gold alloy and porcelain produced the highest stress values in this region. Stresses created by acrylic resin and reinforced composite resin were 25% and 15% less, respectively, than porcelain or gold alloy. Porcelain and gold alloy produced stress values at the lingual implant sites that reached the ultimate strength values of the cortical bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10960992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  8 in total

1.  Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results.

Authors:  Claudio Cacaci; Friederike Cantner; Thomas Mücke; Peter Randelzhofer; Jan Hajtó; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of implant versus tooth-supported zirconia-based single crowns in a split-mouth design: a 4-year clinical follow-up study.

Authors:  Mustafa Barış Güncü; Umut Cakan; Guliz Aktas; Güliz Nigar Güncü; Şenay Canay
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  The effect of various sandblasting conditions on surface changes of dental zirconia and shear bond strength between zirconia core and indirect composite resin.

Authors:  Naichuan Su; Li Yue; Yunmao Liao; Wenjia Liu; Hai Zhang; Xin Li; Hang Wang; Jiefei Shen
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Effect of veneering material on the deformation suffered by implant-supported fixed prosthesis framework.

Authors:  Antônio Francisco Grando; Carlos Eduardo Edwards Rezende; Edson Antônio Capello Sousa; José Henrique Rubo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Comparative three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported fixed complete arch mandibular prostheses in two materials.

Authors:  João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Dayana Campanelli de Morais; Alexandre Abhdala Alonso; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Alexandre Luis Souto Borges
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

6.  Influence of different restorative materials on the stress distribution in dental implants.

Authors:  Carlos-Eduardo Datte; João-Paulo-Mendes Tribst; Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira Dal Piva; Renato-Sussumu Nishioka; Marco-Antonio Bottino; Alexandre-Duarte M Evangelhista; Fabrício M de M Monteiro; Alexandre-Luiz-Souto Borges
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-05-01

7.  Stress distribution in fixed mandibular prostheses fabricated by CAD/CAM and conventional techniques: Photoelastic and strain gauge analyses.

Authors:  Rodrigo-Antonio de Medeiros; Daniela-Micheline Dos Santos; Aldiéris-Alves Pesqueira; Marcio Campaner; Sandro-Basso Bitencourt; Emily-Vivianne-Freitas da Silva; Marcelo-Coelho Goiato
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-09-01

Review 8.  New generation CAD-CAM materials for implant-supported definitive frameworks fabricated by using subtractive technologies.

Authors:  Pinar Cevik; Martin Schimmel; Burak Yilmaz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.